A word for helping but in excess, creating another problem?

Here's a quote from the bible:

“He called out to them, ‘Friends, haven’t you any fish?’ ‘No,’ they answered. He said, ‘Throw your net on the right side of the boat and you will find some.’ When they did, they were unable to haul the net in because of the large number of fish.” - John 21:5-6

The bible is quoted for the sole purpose of being an example for where this word would be applicable. It isn't though because the disciples get their fish to shore and some story goes on, making all people happy and satisfied. Read the book, and don't judge Jesus from a passage.

So, Jesus here is attempting to help his disciples by getting them more fish, but it results in more fish than they can handle, so the help caused them to have another problem to haul the fish. The help simply does not help because it's too much of it.

Another made up example would be someone getting help with his job where the one who's helping finish all of his work, leaving the person jobless, or somehow unemployed. Fail to help by helping.

Is there any word in English (or any other language), that has this meaning or similar?

Solution 1:

The word disservice is sometimes used to mean an action done with good intentions but leading to a bad result:

disservice: an act intended to help that turns out badly

(WordNet)

However, I think you are misinterpreting the Bible passage. The basic rule of hermeneutics is reading the passage in context. If you continue reading, you will find that your statement "the help simply does not help" is not true:

The other disciples came in the boat, dragging the net full of fish...

(ESV, Jn. 21, verse 8)

Obviously, they got the fish all right.

Solution 2:

The word backfire is often used in this situation:

backfire (Of a plan or action)

have an opposite and undesirable effect to what was intended:

overzealous publicity backfired on her

{ODO}

This distances the consequences from the overzealous (would-be) do-gooders.

The word do-gooder itself is usually used in a pejorative sense, for someone more interested in creating an image than in actually benefitting the persons needing help.

Solution 3:

You could consider using the verb boomerang:

to cause harm to the originator; backfire.

[Random House Kernerman Webster's College Dictionary]

The word boomerang effect fits in your context:

Researchers have reported that some public health interventions have produced effects opposite to those intended in health communication such as smoking and alcohol consumption behaviors, and thus have employed various methods to study them under different contexts. Ringold argued that some consumer’s negative reactions on alcoholic beverage warnings and education efforts can be explained concisely by Brehm’s psychological reactance theory.[26] These results suggested that boomerang effects should be considered as potential costs of launching mass communication campaigns.

Mann and Hill[28] investigated the case of litter control and showed that the combination of different positive influence strategies could actually create boomerang effect and decrease the amount of appropriate disposal of waste.

[Wikipedia]

Economist article on the boomerang effect.

As Chinese wages rise, some production is moving back to the rich world

Solution 4:

Consider,

mean well

: to intend to be nice, polite, helpful, etc., but fail in the effort. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of American Idioms and Phrasal Verbs

blow back

: to have a bad effect instead of the result one expected

misfire

: to miss an intended effect or objective M-W

: to fail to achieve the desired result, effect, etc. Random House

fizzle out

: to fail, end weakly, especially after a hopeful beginning. The word fizzle dates from the early 1500s and meant "to break wind without making noise." Later it was applied to hissing noises, such as those made by wet fireworks, and then to any endeavor that ends in disappointment. [Colloquial; mid-1800s] The American Heritage® Dictionary of Idioms by Christine Ammer