What is the precise name for this non sequitur

Randomly came across an article with the title Why Angry White America Fell For Putin today.

Provocative title and content of the article aside, there is an obvious kind of fallacy in the title itself. A statement of the form "Why X" where the truth of X is assumed but not actually an established fact. Is there, and what is, the precise name of this non sequitur?

P.S. First post here. Couldn't find the rhetoric stack exchange so hope this is a good enough place for this.

Solution 1:

This does look a lot like 'begging the question' since the statement, which is yet to be expounded upon in the article, already contains the conclusion ie "they fell for it" (gullible/stupid) because of or in addition to the fact they are "angry white men" (racist and agressive).