Determinant of a Special Symmetric Matrix
Solution 1:
As suggested by @Grigory M I post this as an answer :
A is congruent modulo 2 to a skew-symmetric matrix and an antisymmetric matrix of odd size has a zero determinant.
Solution 2:
Hint. $\det(A)=\sum_{\sigma\in S_n}\operatorname{sgn}(\sigma)\prod_{i=1}^na_{i\sigma(i)}$. Partition $S_n$ into three mutually disjoint subsets. The first subset contains those permutations that have some fixed points. The permutations in the second subset are inverses of the permutations in the third one.
Solution 3:
To expand on user1551's hint, using the formula $$ \det A = \sum_{\sigma \in S_n} {\operatorname{sgn} \sigma} \prod_{i=1}^n a_{i, \sigma(i)} $$
For any permutation $\sigma \in S_n$, the inverse permutation $\sigma^{-1}$ has the same sign as $\sigma$. Furthermore, since the matrix is symmetric, we can conclude that $\sigma$ and $\sigma^{-1}$ each contribute the same value to the determinant, if they are distinct.
Permutations such that $\sigma = \sigma^{-1}$ are a product of disjoint transpositions. Since $n$ is odd, what can we conclude about the contribution of such permutations to the determinant?
Solution 4:
More generally, let $R$ be a commutative ring with unity and with characteristic $2$. If $A\in M_{2k+1}(R)$ is symmetric or skew-symmetric with $0$ diagonal, then $\det(A)=0$. I gave a sketch of a proof in Odd-dimensional skew-symmetric matrix is singular, even in a field of characteristic 2. Curiously user1551 gave also an answer. Note that we may discuss about the definition of a skew-symmetric matrix in characteristic $2$ ; the notion has not any interest if we do not require that the diagonal must be $0$. Thus it is convenient to add this condition in the definition.
Thus assume that $R$ is any commutative ring with unity (with any characteristic) and$A=[a_{i,j}]\in M_{2k+1}(R)$ with $a_{i,j}=-a_{j,i},a_{i,i}=0$. We work in the ring of polynomials $\mathbb{Z}[(a_{i,j})_{i,j}]$ in the indeterminates $(a_{i,j})$. This ring has no zero-divisors, is factorial and its characteristic is $0$. Clearly $\det(A)\in\mathbb{Z}[(a_{i,j})_{i,j}]$ is $0$ (FORMALLY $0$). The determinant that we consider is an evaluation in $R$ and, consequently, is $0$.
Note that $\mathbb{Z}[(a_{i,j})_{i,j}]$ is also an integrally closed ring. This is a key to show that, if $A\in M_{2k}(R)$, then $\det(A)$ is the square of an element of $R$.