The proof of $e^x \leq x + e^{x^2}$ [duplicate]

How can we prove the inequality $e^x \le x + e^{x^2}$ for $x\in\mathbb{R}$?


Solution 1:

Note the inequality $e^t \ge t + 1$ for all $t \in \mathbb{R}$. In particular $e^{x^2} \ge x^2 + 1$.

If $x \le -1$, then $$ e^{x^2} - e^x + x \ge x^2 + 1 - e^0 + x = x(x+1) \ge 0. $$ If $-1 < x < 1$, then \begin{align*} e^{x^2} - e^x + x &\ge x^2 + x + 1 - \sum_{k \ge 0} \frac{x^k}{k!} \\ &= \frac{x^2}{2!} - \sum_{k \ge 3} \frac{x^k}{k!} \\ &\ge \frac{x^2}{2!} - \sum_{k \ge 3} \frac{x^2}{k!} \\ &= x^2 \left( \frac12 - \left[e - 1 - \frac{1}{1!} - \frac{1}{2!} \right]\right) \\ &= x^2 \left( 3 - e \right) \ge 0. \end{align*}

Finally, if $x \ge 1$, then $$ e^{x^2} - e^x + x > e^{x} - e^x + x > 0. $$

Solution 2:

$$e^{x} = 1 + x + \frac{x^2}{2!} + \dots \le 1 + x + 2 \left(\left( \frac{x}{2} \right )^2+\left( \frac{x}{2} \right )^3 +\dots \right)\le 1 + x+\left( \frac{x}{2} \right )^2 \left( \frac {4}{2 - x}\right)$$

$$x + e^{x^2} \ge x +1 + x^2 + \frac{x^4}{2!} = 1+ x+ \left( \frac{x}{2} \right )^2 2(2+x^2) \ge 1+ x+ 4 \left( \frac{x}{2} \right )^2 $$

The inequality is true for all $\Bbb R \setminus (1,3)$, let $b \in (1,2)$, Also, $$e^{(1+b)^2}+1+b \ge e^{(1+b)^2} \ge e^{1+b}$$ hence the inequality holds for all $x\in \Bbb R$

Solution 3:

You have that $e^1< 1+e^{1^2}$. Now see what happens with the derivative on each side, e.g., we have for $x>1$ that $e^x < 1+2xe^{x^2}$ , since $2x>1$ and $e^{x^2}>e^{1}=e$ , so that , when $x>1$, the left-hand side is smaller than the R.H side, and then the R.H side grows faster nafterwards, for $x>1$. Try seeing what happens left of $1$.

We also have that for $x=1 , e^{-1}<-1+e^1$ , and $h(x)=1+2xe^{x^2}$ decreases faster than $e^{x}$ in $(-\infty,-1]$ (Meaning $h(|x|) $ grows faster than $e^{|x|}$). I don't think this is too hard to prove; for $x<-1$ , we have $1-2e^{x^2}< e^{x}$.

The whole issue comes down to the fact that $e^{x^2}$ grows way faster than $e^x$ in $[1, \infty)$ and decreases way faster in $(-\infty, -1]$. In $[-1,1]$ the result still holds; it is a little late now, but I will have a proof by Tuesday night, or I will delete this.