Why is 'True == not False' a syntax error in Python?
It has to do with operator precedence in Python (the interpreter thinks you're comparing True to not, since ==
has a higher precedence than not
). You need some parentheses to clarify the order of operations:
True == (not False)
In general, you can't use not
on the right side of a comparison without parentheses. However, I can't think of a situation in which you'd ever need to use a not
on the right side of a comparison.
It's just a matter of operator precedence. Try:
>>> True == (not False)
True
Have a look in this table of operator precedences, you'll find that ==
binds tigher than not
, and thus True == not False
is parsed as (True == not) False
which is clearly an error.
Answers claiming that the reason for True == not False
constituting a syntax error had to do with operator precedence are mistaken. If that were the case, the expression 2 ** - 1
would yield a syntax error as well, which of course it doesn't. Precedence never causes an operator to be drawn in in place of an operand.
The true reason for True == not False
being a syntax error is that there exists no syntax rule that would produce a comparison therefrom, since
comparison ::= or_expr (comp_operator or_expr)*
- i. e. after the comp_operator ==
an or_expr must follow, which includes an xor_expr, an and_expr, a shift_expr, an a_expr, an m_expr, an u_expr, a power…, but no not_test.
By comparison, the precedence-wise similar construct 2 ** - 1
in accordance with the power rule
power ::= (await_expr | primary) ["**" u_expr]
has u_expr following the power operator **
, thus allowing - x
on the right hand side.