"using namespace" in c++ headers [duplicate]
Solution 1:
You should definitely NOT use using namespace
in headers for precisely the reason you say, that it can unexpectedly change the meaning of code in any other files that include that header. There's no way to undo a using namespace
which is another reason it's so dangerous. I typically just use grep
or the like to make sure that using namespace
isn't being called out in headers rather than trying anything more complicated. Probably static code checkers flag this too.
The header should include just the headers that it needs to compile. An easy way to enforce this is to always include each source file's own header as the first thing, before any other headers. Then the source file will fail to compile if the header isn't self-contained. In some cases, for example referring to implementation-detail classes within a library, you can use forward declarations instead of #include
because you have full control over the definition of such forward declared class.
I'm not sure I would call it common, but it definitely shows up once in a while, usually written by new programmers that aren't aware of the negative consequences. Typically just a little education about the risks takes care of any issues since it's relatively simple to fix.
Solution 2:
Item 59 in Sutter and Alexandrescu's "C++ Coding Standards: 101 Rules, Guidelines, and Best Practices":
59. Don’t write namespace usings in a header file or before an #include.
Namespace
using
s are for your convenience, not for you to inflict on others: Never write ausing
declaration or ausing
directive before an#include
directive.Corollary: In header files, don't write namespace-level
using
directives orusing
declarations; instead, explicitly namespace-qualify all names.
A header file is a guest in one or more source files. A header file that includes using
directives and declarations brings its rowdy buddies over too.
A using
declaration brings in one buddy. A using
directive brings in all the buddies in the namespace. Your teachers' use of using namespace std;
is a using directive.
More seriously, we have namespaces to avoid name clash. A header file is intended to provide an interface. Most headers are agnostic of what code may include them, now or in the future. Adding using
statements for internal convenience within the header foists those convenient names on all the potential clients of that header. That can lead to name clash. And it's just plain rude.
Solution 3:
You need to be careful when including headers inside of headers. In large projects, it can create a very tangled dependency chain that triggers larger/longer rebuilds than were actually necessary. Check out this article and its follow-up to learn more about the importance of good physical structure in C++ projects.
You should only include headers inside a header when absolutely needed (whenever the full definition of a class is needed), and use forward declaration wherever you can (when the class is required is a pointer or a reference).
As for namespaces, I tend to use the explicit namespace scoping in my header files, and only put a using namespace
in my cpp files.