Which method is preferred strstr or strpos?
From the PHP online manual:
If you only want to determine if a particular needle occurs within haystack, use the faster and less memory intensive function
strpos()
instead.
Here are some other answers (+benchmarks) I got to my question, which is almost the same (I didn't realize yours when asking).
In the meantime I also made my own benchmark test, which I ran 1000000 times for each relevant functions (strstr()
, strpos()
, stristr()
and stripos()
).
Here's the code:
<?php
function getmicrotime() {
list($usec, $sec) = explode(" ", microtime());
return ((float) $usec + (float) $sec);
}
$mystring = 'blahblahblah';
$findme = 'bla';
echo 'strstr & strpos TEST:<pre>';
$time_start = getmicrotime();
for($i=0; $i<1000000; $i++) strstr($mystring, $findme);
$time_needed_strstr = getmicrotime() - $time_start;
echo 'strstr(): ',
round( $time_needed_strstr , 8 ). PHP_EOL;
$time_start = getmicrotime();
for($i=0; $i<1000000; $i++) stristr($mystring, $findme);
$time_needed_stristr = getmicrotime() - $time_start;
echo 'stristr(): ',
round( $time_needed_stristr , 8 ) . PHP_EOL;
$time_start = getmicrotime();
for($i=0; $i<1000000; $i++) strpos($mystring, $findme) !== false;
$time_needed_strpos = getmicrotime() - $time_start;
echo 'strpos() !== false: ',
round( $time_needed_strpos , 8 ) . PHP_EOL;
$time_start = getmicrotime();
for($i=0; $i<1000000; $i++) stripos($mystring, $findme) !== false;
$time_needed_stripos = getmicrotime() - $time_start;
echo 'stripos() !== false: ',
round( $time_needed_stripos , 8 ) . PHP_EOL;
echo PHP_EOL;
echo 'time_needed_stristr - time_needed_strstr: ',
round( $time_needed_stristr - $time_needed_strstr , 8) . PHP_EOL;
echo 'time_needed_stripos - time_needed_strpos: ',
round( $time_needed_stripos - $time_needed_strpos , 8) . PHP_EOL;
echo PHP_EOL;
echo 'time_needed_strstr - time_needed_strpos: ',
round( $time_needed_strstr - $time_needed_strpos , 8) . PHP_EOL;
echo 'time_needed_stristr - time_needed_stripos: ',
round( $time_needed_stristr - $time_needed_stripos , 8) . PHP_EOL;
echo '</pre>';
?>
And here is the first output, which shows that strpos()
is the winner:
strstr & strpos TEST:
strstr(): 2.39144707
stristr(): 3.65685797
strpos() !== false: 2.39055395
stripos() !== false: 3.54681897
time_needed_stristr - time_needed_strstr: 1.2654109
time_needed_stripos - time_needed_strpos: 1.15626502
time_needed_strstr - time_needed_strpos: 0.00089312
time_needed_stristr - time_needed_stripos: 0.110039
The next one is similar to the first output (strpos()
is the winner again):
strstr & strpos TEST:
strstr(): 2.39969015
stristr(): 3.60772395
strpos() !== false: 2.38610101
stripos() !== false: 3.34951186
time_needed_stristr - time_needed_strstr: 1.2080338
time_needed_stripos - time_needed_strpos: 0.96341085
time_needed_strstr - time_needed_strpos: 0.01358914
time_needed_stristr - time_needed_stripos: 0.25821209
Below is another one, which is more interesting, because in this case, strstr()
is the winner:
strstr & strpos TEST:
strstr(): 2.35499191
stristr(): 3.60589004
strpos() !== false: 2.37646604
stripos() !== false: 3.51773095
time_needed_stristr - time_needed_strstr: 1.25089812
time_needed_stripos - time_needed_strpos: 1.14126492
time_needed_strstr - time_needed_strpos: -0.02147412
time_needed_stristr - time_needed_stripos: 0.08815908
This means it can really depend on "environmental circumstances", which are sometimes hard to influence, and can change the result of "micro optimization tasks" like this, in case you are just checking whether a string exists in another one or not.
BUT I think in most cases, strpos()
is the winner in comparison to strstr()
.
I hope this test was useful for someone.