Convert generic List/Enumerable to DataTable?
I have few methods that returns different Generic Lists.
Exists in .net any class static method or whatever to convert any list into a datatable? The only thing that i can imagine is use Reflection to do this.
IF i have this:
List<Whatever> whatever = new List<Whatever>();
(This next code doesn't work of course, but i would like to have the possibility of:
DataTable dt = (DataTable) whatever;
Here's a nice 2013 update using FastMember from NuGet:
IEnumerable<SomeType> data = ...
DataTable table = new DataTable();
using(var reader = ObjectReader.Create(data)) {
table.Load(reader);
}
This uses FastMember's meta-programming API for maximum performance. If you want to restrict it to particular members (or enforce the order), then you can do that too:
IEnumerable<SomeType> data = ...
DataTable table = new DataTable();
using(var reader = ObjectReader.Create(data, "Id", "Name", "Description")) {
table.Load(reader);
}
Editor's Dis/claimer: FastMember is a Marc Gravell project. It's gold and full-on flies!
Yes, this is pretty much the exact opposite of this one; reflection would suffice - or if you need quicker, HyperDescriptor
in 2.0, or maybe Expression
in 3.5. Actually, HyperDescriptor
should be more than adequate.
For example:
// remove "this" if not on C# 3.0 / .NET 3.5
public static DataTable ToDataTable<T>(this IList<T> data)
{
PropertyDescriptorCollection props =
TypeDescriptor.GetProperties(typeof(T));
DataTable table = new DataTable();
for(int i = 0 ; i < props.Count ; i++)
{
PropertyDescriptor prop = props[i];
table.Columns.Add(prop.Name, prop.PropertyType);
}
object[] values = new object[props.Count];
foreach (T item in data)
{
for (int i = 0; i < values.Length; i++)
{
values[i] = props[i].GetValue(item);
}
table.Rows.Add(values);
}
return table;
}
Now with one line you can make this many many times faster than reflection (by enabling HyperDescriptor
for the object-type T
).
Edit re performance query; here's a test rig with results:
Vanilla 27179
Hyper 6997
I suspect that the bottleneck has shifted from member-access to DataTable
performance... I doubt you'll improve much on that...
Code:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.ComponentModel;
using System.Data;
using System.Diagnostics;
public class MyData
{
public int A { get; set; }
public string B { get; set; }
public DateTime C { get; set; }
public decimal D { get; set; }
public string E { get; set; }
public int F { get; set; }
}
static class Program
{
static void RunTest(List<MyData> data, string caption)
{
GC.Collect(GC.MaxGeneration, GCCollectionMode.Forced);
GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers();
GC.WaitForFullGCComplete();
Stopwatch watch = Stopwatch.StartNew();
for (int i = 0; i < 500; i++)
{
data.ToDataTable();
}
watch.Stop();
Console.WriteLine(caption + "\t" + watch.ElapsedMilliseconds);
}
static void Main()
{
List<MyData> foos = new List<MyData>();
for (int i = 0 ; i < 5000 ; i++ ){
foos.Add(new MyData
{ // just gibberish...
A = i,
B = i.ToString(),
C = DateTime.Now.AddSeconds(i),
D = i,
E = "hello",
F = i * 2
});
}
RunTest(foos, "Vanilla");
Hyper.ComponentModel.HyperTypeDescriptionProvider.Add(
typeof(MyData));
RunTest(foos, "Hyper");
Console.ReadLine(); // return to exit
}
}
I had to modify Marc Gravell's sample code to handle nullable types and null values. I have included a working version below. Thanks Marc.
public static DataTable ToDataTable<T>(this IList<T> data)
{
PropertyDescriptorCollection properties =
TypeDescriptor.GetProperties(typeof(T));
DataTable table = new DataTable();
foreach (PropertyDescriptor prop in properties)
table.Columns.Add(prop.Name, Nullable.GetUnderlyingType(prop.PropertyType) ?? prop.PropertyType);
foreach (T item in data)
{
DataRow row = table.NewRow();
foreach (PropertyDescriptor prop in properties)
row[prop.Name] = prop.GetValue(item) ?? DBNull.Value;
table.Rows.Add(row);
}
return table;
}