Didn't understand joke about No Child Left Behind [closed]

Solution 1:

No Child Left Behind (NCLB) was a US Act of Congress which mandated that all schools which receive federal financial assistance (for the education of children from low-income families) had to administer an annual standardized test to all students.

According to NCLB, each year, fifth graders must do better in the standardized test than the previous year’s fifth graders. Schools that fail to achieve this for two or more consecutive years were required to take certain measures in order to “improve the school”.

As you can see, NCLB was an act centered around standardized testing. Students’—and by extension their schools’—performance was measured and scrutinized by the test scores.

A common criticism of standardized testing is that it leads teachers to focus on test performance, instead of aiming to help students achieve in-depth understanding of the overall curriculum.

Chomsky talks about how he wasn’t able to successfully carry out experiments in the chemistry lab, and yet scored an A by filling out a paper with the results of the experiments, which were quite obvious. He mentions that the this test-centered approach to education had been going on for about 10 years with “no reported progress”, since, he believes, “serious education” is different and does not focus on standardized test scores.

When Chomsky mentions that this failing approach to education has a name, “No Child Left Behind”, the audience laughs and cheers in order to express their agreement with his ridicule and criticism of this act. The reason they laugh is that he refers to his chemistry lab experience as “No Child Left Behind”, even though it predates the passing of the unpopular act by several years.

Solution 2:

If someone fails a class, then they can be said to have been "left behind": all the other students are moving on to the next class, but the failed student remains to take the class again (this, along with some related meanings, such as some students not learning as much of the material as others, is what the name of the law is referring to). If a teacher is willing to give an A to someone who hasn't come to any classes, then that suggests that their standards are so low that they wouldn't fail anyone no matter how little the student does.

Solution 3:

Chomsky is critiquing No Child Left Behind, a U.S. law requiring each state to set standards for education. Chomsky argues that memorizing to pass these standards facts bores children.

He himself avoided this by not attending boring chemistry classes (long before the law was passed). He calls this boring chemistry class an early example of No Child Left Behind and what he did to avoid it. The audience laughs.

It’s not really a joke.

Solution 4:

So in this particular instance NCLB is funny for three reasons.

[This is how the joke got most ppl in the room to laugh/chuckle]

Reason 1. Chomsky describes what clearly is a questionably competent educational institution. His college is giving him an A for lab work which he never did, (and he finds this humorous), and they are charging him money for a breakage fee to use the lab (which he obviously isn't using) and yet he's still allowing himself to subject to this institution because its working in his favor.

No Child Left Behind has often been criticized as a poor educational policy and thus strikes the same image of a "questionable educational institution" which Chomsky describes himself at college.

The similarity of these two ideas (Chomsky's experience) and (No Child Left Behind) is very surprising (the way he presents it) yet is instantly a universal experience for the audience (they too have felt such things before at some point in their college experience). So it elicits a reaction of laughter.

[This is how the joke got some people to laugh extremely hard]

Reason 2: No Child Left Behind itself has been criticized for allowing kids to pass/encouraging them to pass without deeply understanding what is going on in their material, and for the system not caring about this failure of education as long as it can collect fees for testing/analytics. For those people in the audience cognizant of this criticism his joke was much funnier since he was clearly stating "I had never gone to the lab", "I got an A", "they didn't care, they were just collecting their $17 lab fee". And then compares this to NCLB which has identical criticisms (though I doubt the audience consciously processed this all, it was probably a subconscious understanding). This is a very apt metaphor.

Reason 3. Once enough people in the room are laughing sufficiently intensely everyone starts to laugh more. Laughing is after all contagious.