What's the benefit of using "containers" in the datacenter as opposite to regular installation
easier to move around [ eg to neighbor state that has cheaper energy because of some political turbulence ].
easier to do drop in replacement... whole container not just server-by server.
Also has to due with cooling. Cooling smaller sections of data center is more efficient then cooling a whole data center when one area can be running warmer then others.
The containers can be pre-build at a remote location and shipped to wherever they are required as a complete unit. When working on such a large scale it has a number of advantages.
- Complete consistency, which itself brings many advantages
- Reduced numbers of server build specialists, as few would be needed at the data centers themselves
- Very much faster way to construct new data centers
The list goes on and on but the bottom line is large cost savings.
I've had a good look inside one of the HP 'Pod' containers and although I thought they were great they were very expensive but importantly it made me take a step back and revise my thinking about what IS a data centre. Certainly the idea of spending millions building a traditional hot/cold-row room is starting to look old-hat, drawing ambient filtered air and simply expelling the hot air is much more progressive. The same goes for how much you should put in a rack, I see no reason why you shouldn't fill 50U racks to the top if you trust your air extraction, combining this with blades, virtualisation and converged network can make difference to initial and ongoing costs. So I think containers/pods are great but it's the paradigm shift that's more important - go see a container and let it open your mind :)
In addition to the above:
- Better scaling of capital costs. Most datacenters aren't fully populated immediately after being built, which means that a lot of money gets tied up in things like the building shell, power distribution, uninterruptable power, etc, that sits idle. These container units are largely self-contained, so the costs don't hit until shortly before they are deployed.
- Portability is a big deal. In addition to making it easier to chase lower energy costs, as others have mentioned, they can simplify disaster recovery. In addition, they let massive computing power be deployed to a location relatively quickly and inexpensively. I had a friend working on a project that required crunching huge datasets. It was better for them to set up a container in the parking lot outside his office building than to have to push the huge datasets over a WAN to a big centralized datacenter somewhere.