Use tqdm with concurrent.futures?
Solution 1:
You can wrap tqdm
around the executor
as the following to track the progress:
list(tqdm(executor.map(f, iter), total=len(iter))
Here is your example:
import time
import concurrent.futures
from tqdm import tqdm
def f(x):
time.sleep(0.001) # to visualize the progress
return x**2
def run(f, my_iter):
with concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor() as executor:
results = list(tqdm(executor.map(f, my_iter), total=len(my_iter)))
return results
my_iter = range(100000)
run(f, my_iter)
And the result is like this:
16%|██▏ | 15707/100000 [00:00<00:02, 31312.54it/s]
Solution 2:
The problem with the accepted answer is that the ThreadPoolExecutor.map
function is obliged to generate results not in the order that they become available. So if the first invocation of myfunc
happens to be, for example, the last one to complete, the progress bar will go from 0% to 100% all at once and only when all of the calls have completed. Much better would be to use ThreadPoolExecutor.submit
with as_completed
:
import time
import concurrent.futures
from tqdm import tqdm
def f(x):
time.sleep(0.001) # to visualize the progress
return x**2
def run(f, my_iter):
l = len(my_iter)
with tqdm(total=l) as pbar:
# let's give it some more threads:
with concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=10) as executor:
futures = {executor.submit(f, arg): arg for arg in my_iter}
results = {}
for future in concurrent.futures.as_completed(futures):
arg = futures[future]
results[arg] = future.result()
pbar.update(1)
print(321, results[321])
my_iter = range(100000)
run(f, my_iter)
Prints:
321 103041
This is just the general idea. Depending upon the type of my_iter
, it may not be possible to directly take apply the len
function directly to it without first converting it into a list. The main point is to use submit
with as_completed
.
Solution 3:
Most short way, i think:
with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=20) as executor:
results = list(tqdm(executor.map(myfunc, range(len(my_array))), total=len(my_array)))