Possible problems with NOMINMAX on Visual C++

Using NOMINMAX is the only not-completely-evil way to include <windows.h>. You should also define UNICODE and STRICT. Although the latter is defined by default by modern implementations.

You can however run into problems with Microsoft’s headers, e.g. for GdiPlus. I’m not aware of problems with headers from any other companies or persons.

If the header defines a namespace, as GdiPlus does, then one fix is to create a wrapper for the relevant header, where you include <algorithm>, and inside the header’s namespace, using namespace std; (or alternatively using std::min; and using std::max):

#define NOMINMAX
#include <algorithm>
namespace Gdiplus
{
  using std::min;
  using std::max;
}

Note that that is very different from a using namespace std; at global scope in header, which one should never do.

I don’t know of any good workaround for the case where there's no namespace, but happily I haven’t run into that, so in practice that particular problem is probably moot.

I generally use NOMINMAX like this to limit the potential side effects:

#define NOMINMAX
#include <windows.h>
#undef NOMINMAX

That way the scope of the NOMINMAX is relatively confined.

It's not a perfect solution. If something else has already defined NOMINMAX, this pattern fails (though I've never encountered such a case).

If you want to be really, really careful, then you can #include a wrapper header wherever you would have #included windows.h. The wrapper would go something like this:

/* Include this file instead of including <windows.h> directly. */
#ifdef NOMINMAX
#include <windows.h>
#else
#define NOMINMAX
#include <windows.h>
#undef NOMINMAX
#endif

You could imagine doing other things in the wrapper, too, like enforcing UNICODE and/or STRICT.