Usage of 'consequently to' in a scientific article

No. "Consequently" does not mean simply "it happened after some action." Consequently means that it happened after an action and was caused by that action.

Example: He touched the hot stove; consequently, he burned his fingers.

You may be thinking of "subsequently", which means afterwards but without implied causation.

Example: Coverage gradually diminished. Subsequently, the tracts were reorganized. (The diminution of coverage did not, by itself, accomplish the reorganization.)

There's a logical fallacy called "post hoc, ergo prompter hoc" that means it happened after that, therefore it was caused by that. The misuse of "consequently" is confusing in the same way.