TypeScript filter out nulls from an array
TypeScript, --strictNullChecks
mode.
Suppose I have an array of nullable strings (string | null)[]
. What would be a single-expression way to remove all nulls in a such a way that the result has type string[]
?
const array: (string | null)[] = ["foo", "bar", null, "zoo", null];
const filterdArray: string[] = ???;
Array.filter does not work here:
// Type '(string | null)[]' is not assignable to type 'string[]'
array.filter(x => x != null);
Array comprehensions could've work but they are not supported by TypeScript.
Actually the question can be generalized to the problem of filtering an array of any union type by removing entries having one particular type from the union. But let's focus on unions with null and perhaps undefined as these are the most common usecases.
Solution 1:
You can use a type predicate function in the .filter
to avoid opting out of strict type checking:
function notEmpty<TValue>(value: TValue | null | undefined): value is TValue {
return value !== null && value !== undefined;
}
const array: (string | null)[] = ['foo', 'bar', null, 'zoo', null];
const filteredArray: string[] = array.filter(notEmpty);
Alternatively you can use array.reduce<string[]>(...)
.
2021 update: stricter predicates
While this solution works in most scenarios, you can get a more rigorous type check in the predicate. As presented, the function notEmpty
does not actually guarantee that it identifies correctly whether the value is null
or undefined
at compile time. For example, try shortening its return statement down to return value !== null;
, and you'll see no compiler error, even though the function will incorrectly return true
on undefined
.
One way to mitigate this is to constrain the type first using control flow blocks, and then to use a dummy variable to give the compiler something to check. In the example below, the compiler is able to infer that the value
parameter cannot be a null
or undefined
by the time it gets to the assignment. However, if you remove || value === undefined
from the if condition, you will see a compiler error, informing you of the bug in the example above.
function notEmpty<TValue>(value: TValue | null | undefined): value is TValue {
if (value === null || value === undefined) return false;
const testDummy: TValue = value;
return true;
}
A word of caution: there exist situations where this method can still fail you. Be sure to be mindful of issues associated with contravariance.
Solution 2:
Similar to @bijou-trouvaille's answer, you just need to declare the <arg> is <Type>
as the output of the filter function:
array.filter((x): x is MyType => x !== null);
Solution 3:
One more for good measure as people often forget about flatMap
which can handle filter
and map
in one go (this also doesn't require any casting to string[]
):
// (string | null)[]
const arr = ["a", null, "b", "c"];
// string[]
const stringsOnly = arr.flatMap(f => f ? [f] : []);
Solution 4:
You can cast your filter
result into the type you want:
const array: (string | null)[] = ["foo", "bar", null, "zoo", null];
const filterdArray = array.filter(x => x != null) as string[];
This works for the more general use case that you mentioned, for example:
const array2: (string | number)[] = ["str1", 1, "str2", 2];
const onlyStrings = array2.filter(x => typeof x === "string") as string[];
const onlyNumbers = array2.filter(x => typeof x === "number") as number[];
(code in playground)
Solution 5:
One liner:
const filteredArray: string[] = array.filter((s): s is string => Boolean(s));
TypeScript playground
The trick is to pass a type predicate (:s is string
syntax).
This answer shows that Array.filter
requires users to provide a type predicate.