AWS lambda invoke not calling another lambda function - Node.js
Solution 1:
Note
I will denote by executor the lambda
that executes the second lambda
.
Why Timeout?
Since the executor is "locked" behind a VPC
- all internet communications are blocked.
That results in any http(s)
calls to be timed out as they request packet never gets to the destination.
That is why all actions done by aws-sdk
result in a timeout.
Simple Solution
If the executor does not have to be in a VPC
- just put it out of it, a lambda
can work as well without a VPC
.
Locating the lambda
in a VPC
is required when the lambda
calls resources inside the VPC
.
Real Solution
From the above said, it follows that any resource located inside a VPC
cannot access the internet - that is not correct - just few configurations need to be made.
- Create a
VPC
. - Create 2 Subnets, let one be denoted as private and the second public (these terms are explained ahead, keep reading).
- Create an Internet Gateway - this is a virtual router that connects a
VPC
to the internet. - Create a NAT Gateway - pick the public subnet and create a new
elastic IP
for it (this IP is local to yourVPC
) - this component will pipe communications to theinternet-gateway
. -
Create 2 Routing Tables - one named public and the second private.
- In the public routing table, go to Routes and add a new route:
Destination: 0.0.0.0/0
Target: the ID of the
internet-gateway
- In the private routing table, go to Routes and add a new route:
Destination: 0.0.0.0/0
Target: the ID of the
nat-gateway
A private subnet is a subnet that in its routing table - there is no route to an
internet-gateway
.A public subnet is a subnet that in its routing table - there exists a route to an
internet-gateway
What we had here?
We created something like this:
This, what allows resources in private subnets to call out the internet. You can find more documentation here.
Solution 2:
I've experienced this same problem where Lambdas that are "pinned" to a VPC are not able to invoke other Lambdas. I've been dealing with this issue, without using NAT, by refactoring the structure of my solution.
Let's say I have several lambdas, A, B, C, D,... and I would like these Lambdas to each have query access to an RDS database. In order to have this DB access, I need to put the lambdas in same VPC as database. But I'd also like various lambdas among A, B, C, D,... to invoke one another. So I run into the problem that Arpit describes.
I've been dealing with this issue by splitting each Lambda into two Lambdas: one that focuses on the process flow (i.e. invoking other lambdas and being invoked by another lambda); and the other focusing on doing "real" work, like querying the database. So I now have functions A_flow, B_flow, C_flow, D_flow, ...; and functions A_worker, B_worker, C_worker, D_worker, ... The various flow lambdas are not "pinned" to a specific VPC, and can thus invoke other lambdas. The various worker Lambdas are in the same VPC as database, and can query the DB.
Each flow lambda "delegates" the work of interacting with DB to the corresponding worker lambda. It does this delegation by performing a synchronous invocation of the worker lambda. The worker lambdas do not invoke any other lambdas. (In terms of process flow graph, the worker lambdas are terminal nodes.) In my own system, the invocations of flow Lambdas by other flow lambdas have generally been asynchronous; but I suppose they could be synchronous if desired.
Even though I devised this approach as a workaround, it has a nice feature of cleanly separating the high-level function design into (a) process flow and (b) performing more detailed work, including interaction with DB resources.