Summarising the very helpful comments from @Nap D. Lover and @d.k.o. - In the original theory of conditional probability, there is no such definition of a "conditional random variable."

Before addressing the notation, a thought about the "requirement" of a conditional random variable

  • The purpose of a conditional distribution, $\mathbb P(X=x|Y=y)$, is a way to "recalibrate" the probability assignment/distribution for $X$, given we received information about $Y$. (Which intuitively, could be the probability distribution of the temperature $X$ as $\mathbb P(X=x)$ vs. the probability distribution of the temperature $X$, given the humidity $Y$ was $y$, being $\mathbb P(X=x|Y=y)$). It is still a probability distribution designed for the random variable $X$, just "recalibrated" to better model the "true" probabilities for the given situation.

  • So I guess, in a way, a new random variable for a "conditional random variable" is not really necessary. While it is possible to define a random variable $X_y$ living on a new restricted sample space, maybe it moves away from the idea of this distribution being "rediagnosis" of what the probability distribution of $X$ should be, given the new "symptoms" ($Y=y$).

  • Hence it makes sense to only need Conditional distributions and Conditional expectation (The expected value of $X$, but weighted in a different way to account for the new information) etc, and not a new random variable itself.

The notation: So the interpretation of the notation can be left as what @d.k.o. said in the very first comment, $X|(Y=y) \sim \text{Bin}(m, \lambda)$ is just shorthand notation for saying "The distribution of $X$, conditioned on $Y=y$, is (from the definition in the question) $\text{Bin}(m, \lambda)$.