How to use count and group by at the same select statement
I have an sql select query that has a group by. I want to count all the records after the group by statement. Is there a way for this directly from sql? For example, having a table with users I want to select the different towns and the total number of users
select town, count(*) from user
group by town
I want to have a column with all the towns and another with the number of users in all rows.
An example of the result for having 3 towns and 58 users in total is :
Town Count
Copenhagen 58
NewYork 58
Athens 58
Solution 1:
This will do what you want (list of towns, with the number of users in each):
select town, count(town)
from user
group by town
You can use most aggregate functions when using GROUP BY
:
(COUNT
, MAX
, COUNT DISTINCT
etc.)
Update (following change to question and comments)
You can declare a variable for the number of users and set it to the number of users then select with that.
DECLARE @numOfUsers INT
SET @numOfUsers = SELECT COUNT(*) FROM user
SELECT DISTINCT town, @numOfUsers
FROM user
Solution 2:
You can use COUNT(DISTINCT ...)
:
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT town)
FROM user
Solution 3:
The other way is:
/* Number of rows in a derived table called d1. */
select count(*) from
(
/* Number of times each town appears in user. */
select town, count(*)
from user
group by town
) d1
Solution 4:
Ten non-deleted answers; most do not do what the user asked for. Most Answers mis-read the question as thinking that there are 58 users in each town instead of 58 in total. Even the few that are correct are not optimal.
mysql> flush status;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
SELECT province, total_cities
FROM ( SELECT DISTINCT province FROM canada ) AS provinces
CROSS JOIN ( SELECT COUNT(*) total_cities FROM canada ) AS tot;
+---------------------------+--------------+
| province | total_cities |
+---------------------------+--------------+
| Alberta | 5484 |
| British Columbia | 5484 |
| Manitoba | 5484 |
| New Brunswick | 5484 |
| Newfoundland and Labrador | 5484 |
| Northwest Territories | 5484 |
| Nova Scotia | 5484 |
| Nunavut | 5484 |
| Ontario | 5484 |
| Prince Edward Island | 5484 |
| Quebec | 5484 |
| Saskatchewan | 5484 |
| Yukon | 5484 |
+---------------------------+--------------+
13 rows in set (0.01 sec)
SHOW session status LIKE 'Handler%';
+----------------------------+-------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+----------------------------+-------+
| Handler_commit | 1 |
| Handler_delete | 0 |
| Handler_discover | 0 |
| Handler_external_lock | 4 |
| Handler_mrr_init | 0 |
| Handler_prepare | 0 |
| Handler_read_first | 3 |
| Handler_read_key | 16 |
| Handler_read_last | 1 |
| Handler_read_next | 5484 | -- One table scan to get COUNT(*)
| Handler_read_prev | 0 |
| Handler_read_rnd | 0 |
| Handler_read_rnd_next | 15 |
| Handler_rollback | 0 |
| Handler_savepoint | 0 |
| Handler_savepoint_rollback | 0 |
| Handler_update | 0 |
| Handler_write | 14 | -- leapfrog through index to find provinces
+----------------------------+-------+
In the OP's context:
SELECT town, total_users
FROM ( SELECT DISTINCT town FROM canada ) AS towns
CROSS JOIN ( SELECT COUNT(*) total_users FROM canada ) AS tot;
Since there is only one row from tot
, the CROSS JOIN
is not as voluminous as it might otherwise be.
The usual pattern is COUNT(*)
instead of COUNT(town)
. The latter implies checking town
for being not null, which is unnecessary in this context.