Is the history of h-dropping in English in any way related to the silent h of French?

Solution 1:

The question of H-dropping in English is a frequently revisited one and the succession of theories put forward could be a topic in its own right.

Without going too far back in time one of the most authoritative sources on the subject is James Milroy who, in a paper titled "On the sociolinguistic history of /h/-dropping in English", published in 1983 proposes an extensive sociolinguistic theory of the phenomenon in the context of Middle English. He is regularly cited by later articles and has penned the dialectology contribution in the volume of the "Cambridge History of the English Language" dedicated to Middle English.

A quick summary of his theory could be that:

• The phenomenon was widespread in 1300, "in the dialects of Eastern England Kent and from Surrey to Lincolnshire".

• The tendency was a matter of prestige: "...the regions that were amongst the most important commercially and administratively, and it comes from texts many of which are quite formal in style and learned in content".

• It can probably be ascribed to some form of contact with French which were perceived as more prestigious because H-dropping "does not seem a 'natural' change in Germanic... even if there were sporadic tendencies in /h/-loss in OE, the French-English contact situation was the single most important influence on its rapid progress in Middle English".

The story does not stop there because later authors have made a number of objections.

• Although H-dropping was well advanced in Medieval Latin (it is today complete in Italian¹) the picture was a different one in Medieval French at the time when MFr and ME were in contact.

• As in England where different regions showed different situations, the /h/-loss was more pronounced in the South of France (that's where the Latin influence was stronger as well as the largest part of the Plantagenet continental dominion) and in Paris but other parts of France, including Normandy were generally retaining the "h".

• The later re-insertion of the 'h' in French that occurred under the influence of Latin affected spelling only, not pronunciation, hence the vestigial 'h-muet' - the 'h-aspiré' being actually a hiatus (glottal stop) preventing the 'liaison'. For instance, le homard (from German) has a glottal stop but l'homme - note the elision - (from Latin) doesn't.

• Some /h/ of Greek origin retain the glottal stop such as le héros. So did words of Germanic origin la harpe, le hareng or non-Indo-European languages le harem, le hamac, les haricots ².

• So the Anglo Norman influence should in theory have spared the /h/ in Germanic words.

• Finally, some Swedish and Germanic dialects have undergone some h-loss.

So it seems that French was just a proxy for a phenomenon that in reality had its roots in Late Latin and that in addition English had an endemic tendency for h-loss of its own. This is confirmed by the more general theory of lenition, a general phenomenon of the natural evolution of languages, of which the /h/-loss is actually only the final stage.

All in all the situation is quite different today. As it happens in Present Day English pronouncing the aitches is much well regarded than dropping them - H dropping now being a mark of London Cockney or Estuary English dialects.

Note 1: complete in Italian... except for a few spelling exceptions (like hanno vs anno).
Note 2: here is a short list of French words requiring the h-aspiré. Most of them are not from Latin or Greek origin.

Solution 2:

From the Wikipedia entry on h-dropping:

H-dropping is a linguistic term used to describe the omission of initial /h/ in words like house, heat, and hangover in many dialects of English, such as Cockney and Estuary English. The same phenomenon occurs in many other languages, such as Serbian, and Late Latin, the ancestor of the modern Romance languages. Interestingly, both French and Spanish acquired new initial [h] in mediæval times, but these were later lost in both languages in a "second round" of h-dropping.

So it appears that not only is H-dropping not unique to English, French underwent an H-adding phenomenon at around the same time they were influencing English, making it perhaps less likely that the dropped H in working-class British English was influenced by French speakers.

Solution 3:

"Although H-dropping was well advanced in Medieval Latin "

I always learned that the H in latin was silent in Vulgar Latin as early as the late Republic (before August). Posh people tended to still pronounce it, sometimes hypercorrectively, this upper class affectation was mocked by Catullus.

Also of interest, is the th > f or v in Cockney, just as a French man would say (free instead of three).

And the l > w (milk > milwk) in Cockney, just as animal > animaux, bel > beau.