after_create :foo vs after_commit :bar, :on => :create
Is there any difference between:
after_create :after_create
and after_commit :after_commit_on_create, :on => :create
Can these be used interchangeably?
Solution 1:
They are not interchangeable. The key difference is when the callback runs. In the case of after_create
, this will always be before the call to save
(or create
) returns.
Rails wraps every save
inside a transaction and the before/after create callbacks run inside that transaction (a consequence of this is that if an exception is raised in an after_create the save will be rolled back). With after_commit
, your code doesn't run until after the outermost transaction was committed. This could be the transaction rails created or one created by you (for example if you wanted to make several changes inside a single transaction).
At the point when after_save/create
runs, your save could still be rolled back and (by default) won't be visible to other database connections (e.g. a background task such as sidekiq). Some combination of these 2 is usually the motivation for using after_commit
.
Solution 2:
There is one major difference between these two with respect to associations. after_create is called as soon as an insert query is fired for the given object, and before the insert queries of the associations of the object. This means the values of the associated objects can be changed directly in after_create callbacks without update query.
class Post < ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :post_body
after_create :change_post_body
def change_post_body
self.post_body.content = "haha"
#No need to save
end
end