How the single threaded non blocking IO model works in Node.js

Solution 1:

Node.js is built upon libuv, a cross-platform library that abstracts apis/syscalls for asynchronous (non-blocking) input/output provided by the supported OSes (Unix, OS X and Windows at least).

Asynchronous IO

In this programming model open/read/write operation on devices and resources (sockets, filesystem, etc.) managed by the file-system don't block the calling thread (as in the typical synchronous c-like model) and just mark the process (in kernel/OS level data structure) to be notified when new data or events are available. In case of a web-server-like app, the process is then responsible to figure out which request/context the notified event belongs to and proceed processing the request from there. Note that this will necessarily mean you'll be on a different stack frame from the one that originated the request to the OS as the latter had to yield to a process' dispatcher in order for a single threaded process to handle new events.

The problem with the model I described is that it's not familiar and hard to reason about for the programmer as it's non-sequential in nature. "You need to make request in function A and handle the result in a different function where your locals from A are usually not available."

Node's model (Continuation Passing Style and Event Loop)

Node tackles the problem leveraging javascript's language features to make this model a little more synchronous-looking by inducing the programmer to employ a certain programming style. Every function that requests IO has a signature like function (... parameters ..., callback) and needs to be given a callback that will be invoked when the requested operation is completed (keep in mind that most of the time is spent waiting for the OS to signal the completion - time that can be spent doing other work). Javascript's support for closures allows you to use variables you've defined in the outer (calling) function inside the body of the callback - this allows to keep state between different functions that will be invoked by the node runtime independently. See also Continuation Passing Style.

Moreover, after invoking a function spawning an IO operation the calling function will usually return control to node's event loop. This loop will invoke the next callback or function that was scheduled for execution (most likely because the corresponding event was notified by the OS) - this allows the concurrent processing of multiple requests.

You can think of node's event loop as somewhat similar to the kernel's dispatcher: the kernel would schedule for execution a blocked thread once its pending IO is completed while node will schedule a callback when the corresponding event has occured.

Highly concurrent, no parallelism

As a final remark, the phrase "everything runs in parallel except your code" does a decent job of capturing the point that node allows your code to handle requests from hundreds of thousands open socket with a single thread concurrently by multiplexing and sequencing all your js logic in a single stream of execution (even though saying "everything runs in parallel" is probably not correct here - see Concurrency vs Parallelism - What is the difference?). This works pretty well for webapp servers as most of the time is actually spent on waiting for network or disk (database / sockets) and the logic is not really CPU intensive - that is to say: this works well for IO-bound workloads.

Solution 2:

Well, to give some perspective, let me compare node.js with apache.

Apache is a multi-threaded HTTP server, for each and every request that the server receives, it creates a separate thread which handles that request.

Node.js on the other hand is event driven, handling all requests asynchronously from single thread.

When A and B are received on apache, two threads are created which handle requests. Each handling the query separately, each waiting for the query results before serving the page. The page is only served until the query is finished. The query fetch is blocking because the server cannot execute the rest of thread until it receives the result.

In node, c.query is handled asynchronously, which means while c.query fetches the results for A, it jumps to handle c.query for B, and when the results arrive for A arrive it sends back the results to callback which sends the response. Node.js knows to execute callback when fetch finishes.

In my opinion, because it's a single thread model, there is no way to switch from one request to another.

Actually the node server does exactly that for you all the time. To make switches, (the asynchronous behavior) most functions that you would use will have callbacks.

Edit

The SQL query is taken from mysql library. It implements callback style as well as event emitter to queue SQL requests. It does not execute them asynchronously, that is done by the internal libuv threads that provide the abstraction of non-blocking I/O. The following steps happen for making a query :

  1. Open a connection to db, connection itself can be made asynchronously.
  2. Once db is connected, query is passed on to the server. Queries can be queued.
  3. The main event loop gets notified of the completion with callback or event.
  4. Main loop executes your callback/eventhandler.

The incoming requests to http server are handled in the similar fashion. The internal thread architecture is something like this:

node.js event loop

The C++ threads are the libuv ones which do the asynchronous I/O (disk or network). The main event loop continues to execute after the dispatching the request to thread pool. It can accept more requests as it does not wait or sleep. SQL queries/HTTP requests/file system reads all happen this way.

Solution 3:

Node.js uses libuv behind the scenes. libuv has a thread pool (of size 4 by default). Therefore Node.js does use threads to achieve concurrency.

However, your code runs on a single thread (i.e., all of the callbacks of Node.js functions will be called on the same thread, the so called loop-thread or event-loop). When people say "Node.js runs on a single thread" they are really saying "the callbacks of Node.js run on a single thread".

Solution 4:

Node.js is based on the event loop programming model. The event loop runs in single thread and repeatedly waits for events and then runs any event handlers subscribed to those events. Events can be for example

  • timer wait is complete
  • next chunk of data is ready to be written to this file
  • theres a fresh new HTTP request coming our way

All of this runs in single thread and no JavaScript code is ever executed in parallel. As long as these event handlers are small and wait for yet more events themselves everything works out nicely. This allows multiple request to be handled concurrently by a single Node.js process.

(There's a little bit magic under the hood as where the events originate. Some of it involve low level worker threads running in parallel.)

In this SQL case, there's a lot of things (events) happening between making the database query and getting its results in the callback. During that time the event loop keeps pumping life into the application and advancing other requests one tiny event at a time. Therefore multiple requests are being served concurrently.

event loop high level view

According to: "Event loop from 10,000ft - core concept behind Node.js".

Solution 5:

The function c.query() has two argument

c.query("Fetch Data", "Post-Processing of Data")

The operation "Fetch Data" in this case is a DB-Query, now this may be handled by Node.js by spawning off a worker thread and giving it this task of performing the DB-Query. (Remember Node.js can create thread internally). This enables the function to return instantaneously without any delay

The second argument "Post-Processing of Data" is a callback function, the node framework registers this callback and is called by the event loop.

Thus the statement c.query (paramenter1, parameter2) will return instantaneously, enabling node to cater for another request.

P.S: I have just started to understand node, actually I wanted to write this as comment to @Philip but since didn't have enough reputation points so wrote it as an answer.