Roots of the incomplete gamma function

Is there any way that one can describe all the roots of the incomplete gamma function $\Gamma(n,z)$, for $n\in \mathbb{N}$, analytically?


(This was supposed to be another comment to Raymond's answer, but it got too long.)

As already mentioned by Raymond, we have the relationship (using slightly different notation)

$$\Gamma(n,z)= (n-1)! \exp(-z) e_{n-1}(z)$$

where

$$e_n(z)=\sum_{k=0}^n \frac{z^k}{k!}$$

the partial sums of the Maclaurin series for $\exp(z)$, is sometimes called the exponential sum function. Though a general closed form for the roots of $e_n(z)$ is not known, the distribution of the roots of the polynomial $e_n(nz)$ in the complex plane is pretty well studied:

scaled roots of exponential sum functions

In particular, Gábor Szegő (1924) and Jean Dieudonné (1935) both showed that the roots of the scaled exponential sum function $e_n(nz)$ approach the portion of the curve $|z\exp(1-z)|=1$ (now often referred to as the Szegő curve) within the unit disk as $n\to\infty$. In two papers, Carpenter, Varga, and Waldvogel study the asymptotics of the zeros of $e_n(nz)$. Other papers of interest include those by Buckholtz, Newman and Rivlin (with correction), Conrey and Ghosh, Pritsker and Varga, Walker, and Zemyan. (These are the ones I've read; I'm sure there are other nice papers I've missed.)


With the usual definition we have : $$\Gamma(n,x)=\int_x^{\infty} t^{n-1} e^{-t} dt$$

After repeatedly using integration by parts we may get this formula : $$\Gamma(n,x)= (n-1)! e^{-x} \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \frac{x^k}{k!}$$ so that you are asking for the zeros of the polynomials : $$P_n(x)=\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \frac{x^k}{k!}$$ Let's search the first solutions :

$ \begin{array} {rcc} n & P_n(x) & \mathrm{zeros} \\ \hline \\ 1 & 1 & \emptyset \\ 2 & 1+x & \{-1\} \\ 3 & 1+x+\frac{x^2}{2!} & \{-1-i,-1+i\} \\ 4 & 1+x+\frac{x^2}{2!}+\frac{x^3}{3!} & \{\sqrt[3]{\sqrt{2}-1}-\frac1{\sqrt[3]{\sqrt{2}-1}}-1,..,.. \} \\ \end{array} $

I'll stop here because the algebraic expressions of the zeros are becoming rather long and complicated... (search others with WolframAlpha)
Or did you hope something simpler?