Test parameterization in xUnit.net similar to NUnit

Solution 1:

xUnit offers a way to run parameterized tests through something called data theories. The concept is equivalent to the one found in NUnit but the functionality you get out of the box is not as complete.

Here's an example:

[Theory]
[InlineData("Foo")]
[InlineData(9)]
[InlineData(true)]
public void Should_be_assigned_different_values(object value)
{
    Assert.NotNull(value);
}

In this example xUnit will run the Should_format_the_currency_value_correctly test once for every InlineDataAttribute each time passing the specified value as argument.

Data theories are an extensibility point that you can use to create new ways to run your parameterized tests. The way this is done is by creating new attributes that inspect and optionally act upon the arguments and return value of the test methods.

You can find a good practical example of how xUnit's data theories can be extended in AutoFixture's AutoData and InlineAutoData theories.

Solution 2:

Let me throw one more sample here, just in case it saves some time to someone.

[Theory]
[InlineData("goodnight moon", "moon", true)]
[InlineData("hello world", "hi", false)]
public void Contains(string input, string sub, bool expected)
{
    var actual = input.Contains(sub);
    Assert.Equal(expected, actual);
}

Solution 3:

On your first request, you can follow the examples found here.

You can construct a static class containing the data necessary for a collection of tests

using System.Collections.Generic;

namespace PropertyDataDrivenTests
{
    public static class DemoPropertyDataSource
    {
        private static readonly List<object[]> _data = new List<object[]>
            {
                new object[] {1, true},
                new object[] {2, false},
                new object[] {-1, false},
                new object[] {0, false}
            };

        public static IEnumerable<object[]> TestData
        {
            get { return _data; }
        }
    }
}

Then, using the MemberData attribute, define the test as such

public class TestFile1
{
    [Theory]
    [MemberData("TestData", MemberType = typeof(DemoPropertyDataSource))]
    public void SampleTest1(int number, bool expectedResult)
    {
        var sut = new CheckThisNumber(1);
        var result = sut.CheckIfEqual(number);
        Assert.Equal(result, expectedResult);
    }
}

or if you're using C# 6.0,

[Theory]
[MemberData(nameof(PropertyDataDrivenTests.TestData), MemberType = typeof(DemoPropertyDataSource))]

The first argument of MemberDataAttribute allows you to define the member you use as a datasource, so you have a fair amount of flexibility on reuse.

Solution 4:

According to this article in xUnit you have three "parametrization" options:

1. InlineData
2. ClassData
3. MemberData

InlineData example

[Theory]
[InlineData(1, 2)]
[InlineData(-4, -6)]
[InlineData(2, 4)]
public void FooTest(int value1, int value2)
{
    Assert.True(value1 + value2 < 7)
}

ClassData example

public class BarTestData : IEnumerable<object[]>
{
    public IEnumerator<object[]> GetEnumerator()
    {
        yield return new object[] { 1, 2 };
        yield return new object[] { -4, -6 };
        yield return new object[] { 2, 4 };
    }

    IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator() => GetEnumerator();
}


[Theory]
[ClassData(typeof(BarTestData))]
public void BarTest(int value1, int value2)
{
    Assert.True(value1 + value2 < 7)
}

MemberData example

[Theory]
[MemberData(nameof(BazTestData))]
public void BazTest(int value1, int value2)
{
    Assert.True(value1 + value2 < 7)
}

public static IEnumerable<object[]> BazTestData => new List<object[]>
    {
        new object[] { 1, 2 },
        new object[] { -4, -6 },
        new object[] { 2, 4 },
    };