Can I write a CSS selector selecting elements NOT having a certain class or attribute?

I would like to write a CSS selector rule that selects all elements that don't have a certain class. For example, given the following HTML:

<html class="printable">
    <body class="printable">
        <h1 class="printable">Example</h1>
        <nav>
            <!-- Some menu links... -->
        </nav>
        <a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick="javascript:self.print()">Print me!</a>
        <p class="printable">
            This page is super interresting and you should print it!
        </p>
    </body>
</html>

I would like to write a selector that selects all elements that don't have the "printable" class which, in this case, are the nav and a elements.

Is this possible?

NOTE: in the actual HTML where I would like to use this, there are going to be a lot more elements that don't have the "printable" class than do (I realize it's the other way around in the above example).


Solution 1:

Typically you add a class selector to the :not() pseudo-class like so:

:not(.printable) {
    /* Styles */
}

:not([attribute]) {
    /* Styles */
}

But if you need better browser support (IE8 and older don't support :not()), you're probably better off creating style rules for elements that do have the "printable" class. If even that isn't feasible despite what you say about your actual markup, you may have to work your markup around that limitation.

Keep in mind that, depending on the properties you're setting in this rule, some of them may either be inherited by descendants that are .printable, or otherwise affect them one way or another. For example, although display is not inherited, setting display: none on a :not(.printable) will prevent it and all of its descendants from displaying, since it removes the element and its subtree from layout completely. You can often get around this by using visibility: hidden instead which will allow visible descendants to show, but the hidden elements will still affect layout as they originally did. In short, just be careful.

Solution 2:

:not([class])

Actually, this will select anything that does not have a css class (class="css-selector") applied to it.

I made a jsfiddle demo

    h2 {color:#fff}
    :not([class]) {color:red;background-color:blue}
    .fake-class {color:green}
    <h2 class="fake-class">fake-class will be green</h2>
    <h2 class="">empty class SHOULD be white</h2>
    <h2>no class should be red</h2>
    <h2 class="fake-clas2s">fake-class2 SHOULD be white</h2>
    <h2 class="">empty class2 SHOULD be white</h2>
    <h2>no class2 SHOULD be red</h2>

Is this supported? Yes : Caniuse.com (accessed 02 Jan 2020):

  • Support: 98.74%
  • Partial support: 0.1%
  • Total:98.84%

Funny edit, I was Googling for the opposite of :not. CSS negation?

selector[class]  /* the oposite of :not[]*/

Solution 3:

The :not negation pseudo class

The negation CSS pseudo-class, :not(X), is a functional notation taking a simple selector X as an argument. It matches an element that is not represented by the argument. X must not contain another negation selector.

You can use :not to exclude any subset of matched elements, ordered as you would normal CSS selectors.


Simple example: excluding by class

div:not(.class)

Would select all div elements without the class .class

div:not(.class) {
  color: red;
}
<div>Make me red!</div>
<div class="class">...but not me...</div>

Complex example: excluding by type / hierarchy

:not(div) > div

Would select all div elements which arent children of another div

div {
  color: black
}
:not(div) > div {
  color: red;
}
<div>Make me red!</div>
<div>
  <div>...but not me...</div>
</div>

Complex example: chaining pseudo selectors

With the notable exception of not being able to chain/nest :not selectors and pseudo elements, you can use in conjunction with other pseudo selectors.

div {
  color: black
}
:not(:nth-child(2)){
  color: red;
}
<div>
  <div>Make me red!</div>
  <div>...but not me...</div>
</div>

Browser Support, etc.

:not is a CSS3 level selector, the main exception in terms of support is that it is IE9+

The spec also makes an interesting point:

the :not() pseudo allows useless selectors to be written. For instance :not(*|*), which represents no element at all, or foo:not(bar), which is equivalent to foo but with a higher specificity.

Solution 4:

I think this should work:

:not(.printable)

From "negative css selector" answer.

Solution 5:

Just like to contribute that the above answers of :not() can be very effective in angular forms, rather than creating effects or adjusting the view/DOM,

input.ng-invalid:not(.ng-pristine) { ... your css here i.e. border-color: red; ...}

Ensures that on loading your page, the input fields will only show the invalid (red borders or backgrounds, etc) if they have data added (i.e. no longer pristine) but are invalid.