What is &amp used for

Is there any difference in behaviour of below URL.

I don't know why the & is inserted, does it make any difference ?

www.testurl.com/test?param1=test&current=true

versus

www.testurl.com/test?param1=test&current=true

Solution 1:

& is HTML for "Start of a character reference".

& is the character reference for "An ampersand".

&current; is not a standard character reference and so is an error (browsers may try to perform error recovery but you should not depend on this).

If you used a character reference for a real character (e.g. ™) then it (™) would appear in the URL instead of the string you wanted.

(Note that depending on the version of HTML you use, you may have to end a character reference with a ;, which is why &trade= will be treated as ™. HTML 4 allows it to be ommited if the next character is a non-word character (such as =) but some browsers (Hello Internet Explorer) have issues with this).

Solution 2:

HTML doesn't recognize the & but it will recognize & because it is equal to & in HTML

I looked over this post someone had made: http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum21/8851.htm

Solution 3:

My Source: http://htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp

Another common error occurs when including a URL which contains an ampersand ("&"):

This is invalid:

a href="foo.cgi?chapter=1&section=2&copy=3&lang=en"

Explanation:

This example generates an error for "unknown entity section" because the "&" is assumed to begin an entity reference. Browsers often recover safely from this kind of error, but real problems do occur in some cases. In this example, many browsers correctly convert &copy=3 to ©=3, which may cause the link to fail. Since 〈 is the HTML entity for the left-pointing angle bracket, some browsers also convert &lang=en to 〈=en. And one old browser even finds the entity §, converting &section=2 to §ion=2.

So the goal here is to avoid problems when you are trying to validate your website. So you should be replacing your ampersands with & when writing a URL in your markup.

Note that replacing & with &amp; is only done when writing the URL in HTML, where "&" is a special character (along with "<" and ">"). When writing the same URL in a plain text email message or in the location bar of your browser, you would use "&" and not "&". With HTML, the browser translates "&" to "&" so the Web server would only see "&" and not "&" in the query string of the request.

Hope this helps : )

Solution 4:

That's a great example. When &current is parsed into a text node it is converted to ¤t. When parsed into an attribute value, it is parsed as &current.

If you want &current in a text node, you should write &current in your markup.

The gory details are in the HTML5 parsing spec - Named Character Reference State