How to get Maven dependencies printed to a file in a readable format?
This can (at least now) be done with command line options to the dependency:tree plugin.
Try:
mvn dependency:tree -Doutput=/path/to/file
Reference: Maven Dependency Plugin Page
You only asked about "readable" format, but you can also pass the -DoutputType parameter with various options. Also note that the version I have installed, I get the following warning:
[WARNING] The parameter output is deprecated. Use outputFile instead.
So, consider trying it with -DoutputFile=/path/to/file
Also, I was unable to get the -DoutputType paramater to give me anything other than the default text, but didn't have a chance to play around with it. YMMV.
If you have multiple modules under the same repo/project and want the dependencies of all the modules in one file, so as to be able to diff b/w one build and another to see if something changed somewhere, you can do
$project_dir> mvn dependency:tree -DoutputFile=<absolute_path_to_file> -DappendOutput=true
e.g.
$project_dir> mvn dependency:tree -DoutputFile=`pwd`/mvn_dependency_tree.txt -DappendOutput=true
See other options available at https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin/tree-mojo.html
Adding the
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.servicemix.tooling</groupId>
<artifactId>depends-maven-plugin</artifactId>
</plugin>
plugin produces a classes/META-INF/maven/dependencies.properties
file with the project dependencies easily parseable.
Example of the output produced:
# Project dependencies generated by the Apache ServiceMix Maven Plugin
# Generated at: Mon Oct 10 17:43:00 CEST 2011
groupId = my.group.name
artifactId = my.artifact.name
version = 0.0.1-SNAPSHOT
my.group.name/my.artifact.name/version = 0.0.1-SNAPSHOT
# dependencies
junit/junit/version = 4.8
junit/junit/type = jar
junit/junit/scope = test
org.easymock/easymock/version = 2.4
org.easymock/easymock/type = jar
org.easymock/easymock/scope = test
On GNU/Linux I would just do mvn dependency:tree > myFile
. However, if you're restricted to Windows only, than I would look for Windows' syntax for streaming the output of a command.
According to this site (just a top-results from Google) it seems that Windows' console also use >
sign to direct the output stream to i.e. a file.
So would you mind trying this?