How to make RegEx ignore curly bracket pairs inside of selected curly bracket block? [duplicate]

I want to add this answer for quickreference. Feel free to update.


.NET Regex using balancing groups.

\((?>\((?<c>)|[^()]+|\)(?<-c>))*(?(c)(?!))\)

Where c is used as the depth counter.

Demo at Regexstorm.com

  • Stack Overflow: Using RegEx to balance match parenthesis
  • Wes' Puzzling Blog: Matching Balanced Constructs with .NET Regular Expressions
  • Greg Reinacker's Weblog: Nested Constructs in Regular Expressions

PCRE using a recursive pattern.

\((?:[^)(]+|(?R))*+\)

Demo at regex101; Or without alternation:

\((?:[^)(]*(?R)?)*+\)

Demo at regex101; Or unrolled for performance:

\([^)(]*+(?:(?R)[^)(]*)*+\)

Demo at regex101; The pattern is pasted at (?R) which represents (?0).

Perl, PHP, Notepad++, R: perl=TRUE, Python: Regex package with (?V1) for Perl behaviour.


Ruby using subexpression calls.

With Ruby 2.0 \g<0> can be used to call full pattern.

\((?>[^)(]+|\g<0>)*\)

Demo at Rubular; Ruby 1.9 only supports capturing group recursion:

(\((?>[^)(]+|\g<1>)*\))

Demo at Rubular  (atomic grouping since Ruby 1.9.3)


JavaScript  API :: XRegExp.matchRecursive

XRegExp.matchRecursive(str, '\\(', '\\)', 'g');

JS, Java and other regex flavors without recursion up to 2 levels of nesting:

\((?:[^)(]+|\((?:[^)(]+|\([^)(]*\))*\))*\)

Demo at regex101. Deeper nesting needs to be added to pattern.
To fail faster on unbalanced parenthesis drop the + quantifier.


Java: An interesting idea using forward references by @jaytea.


Reference - What does this regex mean?

  • rexegg.com - Recursive Regular Expressions
  • Regular-Expressions.info - Regular Expression Recursion

Regular expressions are the wrong tool for the job because you are dealing with nested structures, i.e. recursion.

But there is a simple algorithm to do this, which I described in more detail in this answer to a previous question. The gist is to write code which scans through the string keeping a counter of the open parentheses which have not yet been matched by a closing parenthesis. When that counter returns to zero, then you know you've reached the final closing parenthesis.