Method Syntax in Objective-C
Solution 1:
Objective-C methods are designed to be self documenting, and they borrow from the rich tradition of Smalltalk.
I'll try to explain what you have here, -(NSInteger) pickerView:(UIPickerView*)pickerView numberOfRowsInComponent:(NSInteger)component
.
- (NSInteger)
This first portion indicates that this is an Objective C instance method that returns a NSInteger object. the-
(dash) indicates that this is an instance method, where a+
would indicate that this is a class method. The first value in parenthesis is the return type of the method.pickerView:
This portion is a part of the message name. The full message name in this case ispickerView:numberOfRowsInComponent:
. The Objective-C runtime takes this method information and sends it to the indicated receiver. In pure C, this would look likeNSInteger pickerView(UIPickerView* pickerView, NSInteger component)
. However, since this is Objective-C, additional information is packed into the message name.(UIPickerView*)pickerView
This portion is part of the input. The input here is of typeUIPickerView*
and has a local variable name of pickerView.numberOfRowsInComponent:
This portion is the second part of the message name. As you can see here, message names are split up to help indicate what information you are passing to the receiver. Thus, if I were to message an object myObject with the variables foo and bar, I would type:[myObject pickerView:foo numberOfRowsInComponent:bar];
as opposed to C++ style:myObject.pickerView(foo, bar);
.(NSInteger)component
This is the last portion of the input. the input here is of typeNSInteger
and has a local variable name of component.
Solution 2:
In Objective-C, the name of a method is composed of all of the portions of the declaration that are not arguments and types. This method's name would therefore be:
pickerView:numberOfRowsInComponent:
The method would be equivalent to a C-style function that looked as follows:
edit: (with thanks to Jarret Hardie):
NSInteger pickerViewNumberOfRowsInComponent(UIPickerView * pickerView, NSInteger component)
Solution 3:
Adding to the previous answers, I'd just like to say that Objective-C methods (or messages if you prefer) have external and internal parameter names.
So in this case:
- (NSInteger) pickerView:(UIPickerView *)pickerView
numberOfRowsInComponent:(NSInteger)component
numberOfRowsInComponent
is the external name, the one that you would use when calling this method from the outside.
And component
is the internal name of the parameter, the one you use to refer to the parameter from inside of the method.
Hope that clears it up a bit.
Solution 4:
It seems to me that Objective-C method signatures are more like sentences. Each parameter deserves a part in method's name. For instance, in C we could have a method (setPersonData) for setting some information about person:
void setPersonData( char* name, int age, float height ) {
and in Objective-C the method would be more descriptive (setPersonName:andAge:andHeight:), like
- (void) setPersonName: (char *)name andAge:(int)age andHeight:(float)height {