Java: Why is the Date constructor deprecated, and what do I use instead?
The java.util.Date
class isn't actually deprecated, just that constructor, along with a couple other constructors/methods are deprecated. It was deprecated because that sort of usage doesn't work well with internationalization. The Calendar
class should be used instead:
Calendar cal = Calendar.getInstance();
cal.set(Calendar.YEAR, 1988);
cal.set(Calendar.MONTH, Calendar.JANUARY);
cal.set(Calendar.DAY_OF_MONTH, 1);
Date dateRepresentation = cal.getTime();
Take a look at the date Javadoc:
http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/Date.html
tl;dr
LocalDate.of( 1985 , 1 , 1 )
…or…
LocalDate.of( 1985 , Month.JANUARY , 1 )
Details
The java.util.Date
, java.util.Calendar
, and java.text.SimpleDateFormat
classes were rushed too quickly when Java first launched and evolved. The classes were not well designed or implemented. Improvements were attempted, thus the deprecations you’ve found. Unfortunately the attempts at improvement largely failed. You should avoid these classes altogether. They are supplanted in Java 8 by new classes.
Problems In Your Code
A java.util.Date has both a date and a time portion. You ignored the time portion in your code. So the Date class will take the beginning of the day as defined by your JVM’s default time zone and apply that time to the Date object. So the results of your code will vary depending on which machine it runs or which time zone is set. Probably not what you want.
If you want just the date, without the time portion, such as for a birth date, you may not want to use a Date
object. You may want to store just a string of the date, in ISO 8601 format of YYYY-MM-DD
. Or use a LocalDate
object from Joda-Time (see below).
Joda-Time
First thing to learn in Java: Avoid the notoriously troublesome java.util.Date & java.util.Calendar classes bundled with Java.
As correctly noted in the answer by user3277382, use either Joda-Time or the new java.time.* package in Java 8.
Example Code in Joda-Time 2.3
DateTimeZone timeZoneNorway = DateTimeZone.forID( "Europe/Oslo" );
DateTime birthDateTime_InNorway = new DateTime( 1985, 1, 1, 3, 2, 1, timeZoneNorway );
DateTimeZone timeZoneNewYork = DateTimeZone.forID( "America/New_York" );
DateTime birthDateTime_InNewYork = birthDateTime_InNorway.toDateTime( timeZoneNewYork );
DateTime birthDateTime_UtcGmt = birthDateTime_InNorway.toDateTime( DateTimeZone.UTC );
LocalDate birthDate = new LocalDate( 1985, 1, 1 );
Dump to console…
System.out.println( "birthDateTime_InNorway: " + birthDateTime_InNorway );
System.out.println( "birthDateTime_InNewYork: " + birthDateTime_InNewYork );
System.out.println( "birthDateTime_UtcGmt: " + birthDateTime_UtcGmt );
System.out.println( "birthDate: " + birthDate );
When run…
birthDateTime_InNorway: 1985-01-01T03:02:01.000+01:00
birthDateTime_InNewYork: 1984-12-31T21:02:01.000-05:00
birthDateTime_UtcGmt: 1985-01-01T02:02:01.000Z
birthDate: 1985-01-01
java.time
In this case the code for java.time is nearly identical to that of Joda-Time.
We get a time zone (ZoneId
), and construct a date-time object assigned to that time zone (ZonedDateTime
). Then using the Immutable Objects pattern, we create new date-times based on the old object’s same instant (count of nanoseconds since epoch) but assigned other time zone. Lastly we get a LocalDate
which has no time-of-day nor time zone though notice the time zone applies when determining that date (a new day dawns earlier in Oslo than in New York for example).
ZoneId zoneId_Norway = ZoneId.of( "Europe/Oslo" );
ZonedDateTime zdt_Norway = ZonedDateTime.of( 1985 , 1 , 1 , 3 , 2 , 1 , 0 , zoneId_Norway );
ZoneId zoneId_NewYork = ZonedId.of( "America/New_York" );
ZonedDateTime zdt_NewYork = zdt_Norway.withZoneSameInstant( zoneId_NewYork );
ZonedDateTime zdt_Utc = zdt_Norway.withZoneSameInstant( ZoneOffset.UTC ); // Or, next line is similar.
Instant instant = zdt_Norway.toInstant(); // Instant is always in UTC.
LocalDate localDate_Norway = zdt_Norway.toLocalDate();
About java.time
The java.time framework is built into Java 8 and later. These classes supplant the troublesome old legacy date-time classes such as java.util.Date
, Calendar
, & SimpleDateFormat
.
To learn more, see the Oracle Tutorial. And search Stack Overflow for many examples and explanations. Specification is JSR 310.
The Joda-Time project, now in maintenance mode, advises migration to the java.time classes.
You may exchange java.time objects directly with your database. Use a JDBC driver compliant with JDBC 4.2 or later. No need for strings, no need for java.sql.*
classes. Hibernate 5 & JPA 2.2 support java.time.
Where to obtain the java.time classes?
-
Java SE 8, Java SE 9, Java SE 10, Java SE 11, and later - Part of the standard Java API with a bundled implementation.
- Java 9 brought some minor features and fixes.
-
Java SE 6 and Java SE 7
- Most of the java.time functionality is back-ported to Java 6 & 7 in ThreeTen-Backport.
-
Android
- Later versions of Android (26+) bundle implementations of the java.time classes.
- For earlier Android (<26), the latest Android tooling enables a process known as API desugaring to provide a subset of the java.time functionality not originally built into Android.
- If the desugaring does not offer what you need, the ThreeTenABP project adapts ThreeTen-Backport (mentioned above) to Android. See How to use ThreeTenABP….
The specific Date
constructor is deprecated, and Calendar
should be used instead.
The JavaDoc
for Date describes which constructors are deprecated and how to replace them using a Calendar
.
I came across this question as a duplicate of a newer question which asked what the non-deprecated way to get a Date
at a specific year, month, and day was.
The answers here so far say to use the Calendar
class, and that was true until Java 8 came out. But as of Java 8, the standard way to do this is:
LocalDate localDate = LocalDate.of(1985, 1, 1);
And then if you really really need a java.util.Date
, you can use the suggestions in this question.
For more info, check out the API or the tutorials for Java 8.
One reason that the constructor is deprecated is that the meaning of the year parameter is not what you would expect. The javadoc says:
As of JDK version 1.1, replaced by
Calendar.set(year + 1900, month, date)
.
Notice that the year field is the number of years since 1900
, so your sample code most likely won't do what you expect it to do. And that's the point.
In general, the Date
API only supports the modern western calendar, has idiosyncratically specified components, and behaves inconsistently if you set fields.
The Calendar
and GregorianCalendar
APIs are better than Date
, and the 3rd-party Joda-time APIs were generally thought to be the best. In Java 8, they introduced the java.time
packages, and these are now the recommended alternative.