#include all .cpp files into a single compilation unit?

Solution 1:

It's referred to by some (and google-able) as a "Unity Build". It links insanely fast and compiles reasonably quickly as well. It's great for builds you don't need to iterate on, like a release build from a central server, but it isn't necessarily for incremental building.

And it's a PITA to maintain.

EDIT: here's the first google link for more info: http://buffered.io/posts/the-magic-of-unity-builds/

The thing that makes it fast is that the compiler only needs to read in everything once, compile out, then link, rather than doing that for every .cpp file.

Bruce Dawson has a much better write up about this on his blog: http://randomascii.wordpress.com/2014/03/22/make-vc-compiles-fast-through-parallel-compilation/

Solution 2:

Unity builds improved build speeds for three main reasons. The first reason is that all of the shared header files only need to be parsed once. Many C++ projects have a lot of header files that are included by most or all CPP files and the redundant parsing of these is the main cost of compilation, especially if you have many short source files. Precompiled header files can help with this cost, but usually there are a lot of header files which are not precompiled.

The next main reason that unity builds improve build speeds is because the compiler is invoked fewer times. There is some startup cost with invoking the compiler.

Finally, the reduction in redundant header parsing means a reduction in redundant code-gen for inlined functions, so the total size of object files is smaller, which makes linking faster.

Unity builds can also give better code-gen.

Unity builds are NOT faster because of reduced disk I/O. I have profiled many builds with xperf and I know what I'm talking about. If you have sufficient memory then the OS disk cache will avoid the redundant I/O - subsequent reads of a header will come from the OS disk cache. If you don't have enough memory then unity builds could even make build times worse by causing the compiler's memory footprint to exceed available memory and get paged out.

Disk I/O is expensive, which is why all operating systems aggressively cache data in order to avoid redundant disk I/O.

Solution 3:

I wonder if that ALL.cpp is attempting to put the entire project within a single compilation unit, to improve the ability for the compiler to optimize the program for size?

Normally some optimizations are only performed within distinct compilation units, such as removal of duplicate code and inlining.

That said, I seem to remember that recent compilers (Microsoft's, Intel's, but I don't think this includes GCC) can do this optimization across multiple compilation units, so I suspect that this 'trick' is unneccessary.

That said, it would be curious to see if there is indeed any difference.

Solution 4:

I agree with Bruce; from my experience I had tried implementing the Unity Build for one of my .dll projects which had a ton of header includes and lots of .cpps; to bring down the overall Compilation time on the VS2010(had already exhausted the Incremental Build options) but rather than cutting down the Compilation time, I ran out of memory and the Build not even able to finish the Compilation.

However to add; I did find enabling the Multi-Processor Compilation option in Visual Studio quite helps in cutting down the Compilation time; I am not sure if such an option is available across other platform compilers.