Usage of the colon in this sentence (and alternatives) [duplicate]
I've seen a few questions on this site relating to semi-colons, which I believe I correctly understand, but what I'm not as clear about is colons. For example:
The man ate the apple; it tasted good.
Is this not correctly also written as:
The man ate the apple: it tasted good.
In this case, what is the difference between the two sentences?
Solution 1:
In your example, the first one is correct but the second one is incorrect.
Use a semi-colon to connect two related independent clauses.
They took the money from the vault; they took it quickly.
The ideas are related, the clauses stand on their own, semi-colon is OK here.
Use a colon to separate equal things (like an '=' sign).
Just remember three things: be on time, bring the money, and come alone.
The things here = those three items.
Solution 2:
Colon is a punctuation mark indicating
- that a writer is introducing a quotation or a list of items.
- that a writer is separating two clauses of which the second expands or illustrates the first.
- a statement of proportion between two numbers: a ratio of 10:1.
- the separation of hours from minutes (and minutes from seconds) in a statement of time given in numbers: 4:30 p.m.
- the number of the chapter and verse respectively in biblical references: Exodus 3:2.
Semicolon is a punctuation mark indicating a pause, typically between two main clauses, that is more pronounced than that indicated by a comma.
In your example, the colon is not what I would use.