Link with target="_blank" and rel="noopener noreferrer" still vulnerable?

You may be misunderstanding the vulnerability. You can read more about it here: https://www.jitbit.com/alexblog/256-targetblank---the-most-underestimated-vulnerability-ever/

Essentially, adding rel="noopener noreferrer" to links protects your site's users against having the site you've linked to potentially hijacking the browser (via rogue JS).

You're asking about removing that attribute via Developer Tools - that would only potentially expose you (the person tampering with the attribute) to the vulnerability.

Update as of 2021: All current versions of major browsers now automatically use the behavior of rel="noopener" for any target="_blank" link, nullifying this issue. See more at chromestatus.com.

Links with target="_blank" on them are vulnerable to having the referrer page being swapped out in the background while the user's attention is diverted by the newly-opened tab. This is known as reverse tabnapping:

The referring page is stored in window.opener, and a malicious site could modify this through:

if (window.opener) {
   window.opener.location = "https://phish.example.com";
}

Adding rel="noopener noreferrer" fixes this vulnerability in all major browsers.

Note that you could theoretically remove the rel client-side through manipulation... but why would you want to? All you are doing is deliberately making yourself vulnerable to the attack.

Other users who visit the same website (and don't modify their own client-side code) would still be safe, as the server would still serve up the rel="noopener noreferrer". Your removal of it only applies to you.

Browsers fix

All major browsers have fixed this issue by updating the default behaviour to be secure without having to specify rel property. Read more in About rel=noopener.

• Chrome fixed it at v88
• Safari fixed it in 2016!
• Firefox fixed it at v52
• New Edge is Chromium based, so fixed too

Regarding the Lighthouse Best Practices audits report:

Add rel="noopener" or rel="noreferrer" to any external links to improve performance and prevent security vulnerabilities.

In general, when you use target="_blank", always add rel="noopener" or rel="noreferrer":

For example:

<a href="https://www.kaiostech.com/store/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">
  KaiStore
</a>

• rel="noopener" prevents the new page from being able to access the window.opener property and ensures it runs in a separate process.
• rel="noreferrer" has the same effect but also prevents the Referer header from being sent to the new page.

See the official document for more information.

There's no answer pointing out a case when you would actually want to pass referrer just ignoring any "security risk" warnings: for instance, when you are linking your own external website, which is controlled by you/your org and which presumably has no described security vulnerabilities.

For instance, in my case, in I want to see in Google Analytics how many of my visitors read docs by clicking links inside the web app (which uses a separate domain from where docs are) and how many come from search engines, and hence I want to utilize the referrer header for distinguishing these user groups.

Here's how you can do it when linking websites like your own docs that are safe for sure:

{/* Safe link to the own website *//* eslint-disable-next-line react/jsx-no-target-blank */}
<a href="https://my-own-website.com" target="_blank">
  Learn more
</a>

In React, I made a wrapper common component to avoid putting eslint-disable everywhere in the code (an opposite to UnsafeExternalLink component):

import React, { ReactNode } from 'react';

/* eslint-disable react/jsx-no-target-blank */

/**
 * Safe link to own external websites only.
 */
const SafeExternalLink = ({
  href,
  children,
}: {
  href: string;
  children: ReactNode;
}) => (
  <a href={href} target="_blank">
    {children}
  </a>
);

export default SafeExternalLink;