SVN: Folder already under version control but not comitting?
Solution 1:
Copy problematic folder into some backup directory and remove it from your SVN working directory. Remember to delete all .svn
hidden directories from the copied folder.
Now update your project, clean-up and commit what has left. Now move your folder back to working directory, add it and commit. Most of the time this workaround works, it seems that basically SVN got confused...
Update: quoting comment by @Mark:
Didn't need to move the folder around, just deleting the
.svn
folder and then svn-adding it worked.
Solution 2:
I had a similar-looking problem after adding a directory tree which contained .svn directories (because it was an svn:external in its source environment): svn status told me "?", but when trying to add it, it was "already under version control".
Since no other versioned directories were present, I did
find . -mindepth 2 -name '.svn' -exec rm -rf '{}' \;
to remove the wrong .svn directories; after doing this, I was able to add the new directory.
Note:
- If other versioned directories are contained, the find expression must be changed to be more specific
- If unsure, first omit the "-exec ..." part to see what would be deleted
Solution 3:
A variation on @gauss256's answer, deleting .svn
, worked for me:
rm -rf troublesome_folder/.svn
svn add troublesome_folder
svn commit
Before Gauss's solution I tried @jwir3's approach and got no joy:
svn cleanup
svn cleanup *
svn cleanup troublesome_folder
svn add --force troublesome_folder
svn commit
Solution 4:
(1) This just happened to me, and I thought it was interesting how it happened. Basically I had copied the folder to a new location and modified it, forgetting that it would bring along all the hidden .svn directories. Once you realize how it happens it is easier to avoid in the future.
(2) Removing the .svn directories is the solution, but you have to do it recursively all the way down the directory tree. The easiest way to do that is:
find troublesome_folder -name .svn -exec rm -rf {} \;
Solution 5:
Have you tried performing an svn cleanup?