Ways to make a series diverge "faster" to show divergence

Here is a dataexample using the Euler-summation of negative instead of positive orders. I used the slowly divergent series $1+1/2+1/3+1/4+...$ and the sequences of partial sums using Eulersummation $ES(0)$ (direkt summation= no transformation) , Eulersummation $ES(-0.5)$ which has negative order and should accelerate divergence and Eulersummation $ES(-0.9)$ which accelerates divergence but even "overtunes" it: it makes it look like an alternating series. (All computations based on 32 elements) :

  ES(0)(direct)     ES(-0.5)          ES(-0.9)
  1.00000000000  1.00000000000      1.00000000000
  1.50000000000  2.00000000000      6.00000000000
  1.83333333333  2.33333333333     -5.66666666667
  2.08333333333  2.66666666667      49.3333333333
  2.28333333333  2.86666666667     -245.666666667
  2.45000000000  3.06666666667      1526.00000000
  2.59285714286  3.20952380952     -9861.85714286
  2.71785714286  3.35238095238      67007.4285714
  2.82896825397  3.46349206349     -471076.460317
  2.92896825397  3.57460317460      3403128.53968
  3.01987734488  3.66551226551     -25125107.3694
  3.10321067821  3.75642135642      188836662.782
  3.18013375513  3.83334443334     -1440564509.14
  3.25156232656  3.91026751027      11129101675.0
  3.31822899323  3.97693417693     -86914294560.5
  3.38072899323  4.04360084360      685177450795.
  3.43955252264  4.10242437301  -5.44613935055E12
  3.49510807820  4.16124790242   4.36043950602E13
  3.54773965714  4.21387948137  -3.51381487300E14
  3.59773965714  4.26651106032   2.84800415982E15
  3.64535870476  4.31413010794  -2.32041361096E16
  3.69081325022  4.36174915556   1.89949738822E17
  3.73429151109  4.40522741643  -1.56161905953E18
  3.77595817775  4.44870567730   1.28888235269E19
  3.81595817775  4.48870567730  -1.06760841088E20
  3.85441971622  4.52870567730   8.87251757254E20
  3.89145675325  4.56574271433  -7.39618656227E21
  3.92717103897  4.60277975137   6.18296908223E22
  3.96165379759  4.63726250999  -5.18235419676E23
  3.99498713092  4.67174526861   4.35431150851E24
  4.02724519544  4.70400333313  -3.66693900482E25
  4.05849519544  4.73626139764   3.09468091836E26

However, I do not really think that this can be a general useful tool: since also convergent series might look like divergent by such "inverse" transformations. Here I used $1+1/2^2+1/3^2+1/4^2+...$

   ES(0)(direct)    ES(-0.5)          ES(-0.9)
  1.00000000000  1.00000000000      1.00000000000
  1.25000000000  1.50000000000      3.50000000000
  1.36111111111  1.44444444444     -7.88888888889
  1.42361111111  1.55555555556      57.1111111111
  1.46361111111  1.52888888889     -352.888888889
  1.49138888889  1.58000000000      2402.38888889
  1.51179705215  1.56390022676     -16936.9478458
  1.52742205215  1.59383219955      123212.235828
  1.53976773117  1.58289745528     -917619.148652
  1.54976773117  1.60275636180      6963787.31960
  1.55803219398  1.59477262837     -53665499.9384
  1.56497663842  1.60900149714      418884302.009
  1.57089379818  1.60287884486     -3305102741.43
  1.57599583900  1.61362133802      26320630606.8
  1.58044028344  1.60875562173     -211296315925.
  1.58434653344  1.61717979015   1.70819287210E12
  1.58780674106  1.61320690798  -1.38954751976E13
  1.59089316081  1.62000633266   1.13658899049E14
  1.59366324391  1.61669272000  -9.34278213695E14
  1.59616324391  1.62230655034   7.71398168189E15
  1.59843081761  1.61949494420  -6.39481412903E16
  1.60049693331  1.62421545194   5.32067131888E17
  1.60238729248  1.62179578230  -4.44177875633E18
  1.60412340359  1.62582540701   3.71945515959E19
  1.60572340359  1.62371815228  -3.12340250305E20
  1.60720269353  1.62720177203   2.62971858850E21
  1.60857443564  1.62534794030  -2.21942324134E22
  1.60984994585  1.62839210680   1.87735425152E23
  1.61103900649  1.62674694346  -1.59133257136E24
  1.61215011760  1.62943185453   1.35152568303E25
  1.61319070033  1.62796074625  -1.14995824956E26
  1.61416726283  1.63034797478   9.80133223927E26

With $ES(-0.5)$ we get a sequence which lingers around at least in the near of the known result - but who would prognose that this extrapolates actually to a certain limit. And the sequence of partial sums of the $ES(-0.9)$-acceleration looks undoubtedly divergent...

So I think with the standard tools for acceleration/divergent summation taken only in an obviously/naively inverted way we are not yet really succeeding/proceeding in the desired direction...