I am a pansexual trans/gender-fluid person
There's a risk of me potentially offending someone but I am an outsider trying to get to grips with this terminology. Online, I read someone who identified themself as a
pansexual trans/gender-fluid person
I'd like to know if my understanding of the following terms is generally correct.
I just about get the difference between a transsexual and a transgender. The former is someone who has undergone a sex change that matches their personality and psychological identity, whereas a transgender does not necessarily have their sexual organs altered by surgery to match the sex they feel is theirs from birth.
I believe that a gender fluid person is someone who can fluctuate between feeling male or female, or they perceive to have the characteristics of both sexes within themselves and as such, they do not assign themselves a specific sex.
However, I'm not entirely sure what a pansexual is. Online research suggests it is someone who is sexually attracted and has sexual intercourse with either sex, i.e. male and female persons. But isn't that the same as a bisexual?
(pansexual in Wikipedia)
Pansexuality, or omnisexuality, is the sexual, romantic or emotional attraction towards people regardless of their sex or gender identity. Pansexual people may refer to themselves as gender-blind, asserting that gender and sex are not determining factors in their romantic or sexual attraction to others.
And Oxford Dictionaries define pansexual as
adjective
Not limited in sexual choice with regard to biological sex, gender, or gender identity.
The term pansexual has its origin in 1917 and is a compound of pan- meaning "all" and -sexual, of or related to sex.
Yet, the definition of the older term bisexual, first recorded in 1815–25 but whose meaning of "attracted to both sexes" is from 1914, is very similar to that of pansexual.
From Dictionary.com and Oxford Dictionaries:
bisexual
noun 4. a person who is romantically or sexually attracted to both men and women, or to people of various gender identities; ambisexual.
bisexual
• adjective Sexually attracted not exclusively to people of one particular gender; attracted to both men and women.
• noun A person who is sexually attracted not exclusively to people of one particular gender.
Q 1. What is the difference between a bisexual and a pansexual?
Q 2. I understand that the term gender-fluid was created for those who do not want to be defined as a man or woman, but gender-fluid has many derivatives: agender, nongendered, genderless, and genderfree. Why is there no agreement in the LGTBQ community for a single, simple term to express this gender and sexual preference?
The other answers are well-taken. To attempt a tl;dr:
Q1. What is the difference between a bisexual and a pansexual?
The people? Probably nothing. But the difference between the terms 'bisexual' and 'pansexual' is that the former implicitly assumes two genders ('binary gender') or attraction to only two genders while the latter implies that there are more (possibly many more) than 'male' and 'female'. People who identify as pansexual may not have issues with bisexuals per se but probably consider their own terminology more inclusive of the genderqueer.
Q2. Why is there no agreement in the LGTBQ community for a single, simple term to express this gender and sexual preference?
1st, because people disagree about language choices all the time for no good reason at all. All the moreso when so many neologisms are dealing so closely with identity, sexuality, and politics. 2nd, because 'the LGTBQ community' is an expression, not an actual gang that has regular conferences with a steering committee to hash out things in the interim. 3rd, because those terms, especially as self-applied, are not precisely overlapping and do not imply a new set third gender but an openness to either conceiving of more than two or personally ignoring them, whatever and however many they are.
Q2. Why is there no agreement in the LGTBQ community for a single, simple term to express this gender and sexual preference?
A2. Because the LGTBQ is not a single speech community, that's why.
A speech community -- a bunch of people who talk (mostly) with one another -- is where agreements on single terms take place subliminally, and they have already taken place in the various real speech communities that constitute the membership of a brand-new sociopolitical merger so diverse that we need a five-letter acronym for it.
All over the world there are local L,G,T,B, and Q speech communities (sometimes not formally united, or simply not socially connected, into LGTBQ. Yet.) And they have been there for a long time. Many speak English. They have their own speech terms and their own meanings to go with them and their own histories and mythologies. These things don't blend together coherently very fast, especially under social pressure.
So it's unlikely that there are -- or even could be -- any single, simple terms so early. At this stage of development the norm is evanescent pansemantic trans/meaning-fluid terms.
I want to specifically address the first question in a way that it hasn't been yet.
Q 1. What is the difference between a bisexual and a pansexual?
Bisexualism works only in a context where gender is binary. It assumes that people are only one of two possible genders—and that if you are bisexual you are attracted to both. But gender neutrality eliminates this dichotomy altogether.
(Note, too, that the distinction we now make between sex and gender is something only relatively recent.)
There are people who positively identify as gender-neutral (or as a non-binary gender). They do not consider themselves to be either gender. And while some may identify with various components on a sliding scale or spectrum (with one gender at one end and another gender at the other end), others consider themselves to have no gender identity at all, and still others consider themselves to have an identity that is simply "outside" any such binary scale.
In other words, some people who are gender neutral reject not only two possible genders but also the idea of a defining spectrum between two genders. (At least with respect to themselves.)
From an interesting article called "10 things you always wanted to know about being non-binary but were afraid to ask":
If you're looking at gender on a spectrum from male to female, non-binary could be anywhere outside of that spectrum [emphasis mine] or in between the male and female.
So, coming back to pansexualism, it may be somewhat misleading to say that somebody who is pansexual is attracted to all people "regardless of where they fit on a spectrum" (unless you also include everybody who isn't on that spectrum). Instead, I would say that they are simply attracted to people period, regardless of gender identity or non-identity.
Here is some additional information, as pulled from comments.
Although Dictionary.com says that a bissexual is attracted to people of various gender identities, both Merriam-Webster and Oxford continue to explicitly use a binary definition for the word. At least traditionally, a bisexual is attracted to both men and women. But (by some definitions), they would not be attracted to somebody who doesn't identify as male or female.
Practically speaking, bisexualism might amount to the same thing as pansexualism. But still, there is a logical distinction between "I like all colours" and "colour is irrelevant."
The definition of pansexual provided in the question states (the emphasis is mine) that: "Pansexual people may refer to themselves as gender-blind, asserting that gender and sex are not determining factors in their romantic or sexual attraction to others."
Somebody who is colour blind is literally not influenced by the choice of those colours they can't distinguish—except intellectually. That's what's meant by "gender blind" when it comes to pansexuality. Bisexuals can differentiate between genders (although they are attracted to both); but pansexuals simply don't differentiate between them at all (aside from intellectually).
To reuse an analogy from a different answer, I like steak and I like pasta. But when I go to a restaurant that has both on the menu, I decide which of those I want to eat on that particular night—which one I'm more in the mood for. However, for somebody without taste buds (somebody who is "taste blind") the flavour of those two menu items will have no bearing on their choice. For them, based on taste alone, the two are indistinguishable, and they might as well be contemplating the same thing. They will make their decision based on other factors (price, calories, size, and so on).
Similarly, consider a bisexual who's presented with a choice between a man and a woman. While they are attracted to both, they might be feeling more partial to one gender. It likely won't be the only factor in their choice of partner, but it will be at least a factor.
For a pansexual, who is "gender blind," it won't be a factor at all. They won't feel any more partial to a particular gender than any other at any given time, simply because it's not part of their perception. They are simply unaware of gender in any way—aside from intellectually. For them, their choice in partner is only (and always) about all of the non-gender factors.
As for the second question, this culture, and the terminology behind it, is so new that language and attitudes haven't yet had time to "shake out" into a cohesive consensus yet. That there is no agreement comes down to the timing of adoption.
(It was only in 2017 that both The Chicago Manual of Style and the Associated Press Stylebook acknowledged the use of they and their (and even themself) as an acceptable form of gender-neutral third-person pronoun if required—but in particular when used in the context of people who use it as part of their identify as having a non-binary gender.)