Python 3.6 project structure leads to RuntimeWarning
Solution 1:
For this particular case, the double import warning is due to this line in proj/__init__.py
:
from .proj import main
What that line means is that by the time the -m
switch implementation finishes the import proj
step, proj.proj
has already been imported as a side effect of importing the parent package.
Avoiding the warning
To avoid the warning, you need to find a way to ensure that importing the parent package doesn't implicitly import the package being executed with the -m
switch.
The two main options for resolving that are:
- Drop the
from .proj import main
line (as @John Moutafis suggested), assuming that can be done without breaking API compatibility guarantees; or -
Delete the
if __name__ == "__main__":
block from theproj
submodule and replace it with a separateproj/__main__.py
file that just does:from .proj import main main()
If you go with option 2, then the command line invocation would also change to just be python -m proj
, rather than referencing a submodule.
A more backwards compatible variant of option 2 is to add __main__.py
without deleting the CLI block from the current submodule, and that can be an especially good approach when combined with DeprecationWarning
:
if __name__ == "__main__":
import warnings
warnings.warn("use 'python -m proj', not 'python -m proj.proj'", DeprecationWarning)
main()
If proj/__main__.py
is already being used for some other purpose, then you can also do things like replacing python -m proj.proj
with python -m proj.proj_cli
, where proj/proj_cli.py
looks like:
if __name__ != "__main__":
raise RuntimeError("Only for use with the -m switch, not as a Python API")
from .proj import main
main()
Why does the warning exist?
This warning gets emitted when the -m
switch implementation is about to go and run an already imported module's code again in the __main__
module, which means you will have two distinct copies of everything it defines - classes, functions, containers, etc.
Depending on the specifics of the application, this may work fine (which is why it's a warning rather than an error), or it may lead to bizarre behaviour like module level state modifications not being shared as expected, or even exceptions not being caught because the exception handler was trying to catch the exception type from one instance of the module, while the exception raised used the type from the other instance.
Hence the vague this may cause unpredictable behaviour
warning - if things do go wrong as a result of running the module's top level code twice, the symptoms may be pretty much anything.
How can you debug more complex cases?
While in this particular example, the side-effect import is directly in proj/__init__.py
, there's a far more subtle and hard to debug variant where the parent package instead does:
import some_other_module
and then it is some_other_module
(or a module that it imports) that does:
import proj.proj # or "from proj import proj"
Assuming the misbehaviour is reproducible, the main way to debug these kinds of problems is to run python in verbose mode and check the import sequence:
$ python -v -c "print('Hello')" 2>&1 | grep '^import'
import zipimport # builtin
import site # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/site.pyc
import os # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/os.pyc
import errno # builtin
import posix # builtin
import posixpath # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/posixpath.pyc
import stat # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/stat.pyc
import genericpath # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/genericpath.pyc
import warnings # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/warnings.pyc
import linecache # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/linecache.pyc
import types # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/types.pyc
import UserDict # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/UserDict.pyc
import _abcoll # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/_abcoll.pyc
import abc # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/abc.pyc
import _weakrefset # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/_weakrefset.pyc
import _weakref # builtin
import copy_reg # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/copy_reg.pyc
import traceback # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/traceback.pyc
import sysconfig # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/sysconfig.pyc
import re # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/re.pyc
import sre_compile # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/sre_compile.pyc
import _sre # builtin
import sre_parse # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/sre_parse.pyc
import sre_constants # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/sre_constants.pyc
import _locale # dynamically loaded from /usr/lib64/python2.7/lib-dynload/_localemodule.so
import _sysconfigdata # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/_sysconfigdata.pyc
import abrt_exception_handler # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/abrt_exception_handler.pyc
import encodings # directory /usr/lib64/python2.7/encodings
import encodings # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/encodings/__init__.pyc
import codecs # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/codecs.pyc
import _codecs # builtin
import encodings.aliases # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/encodings/aliases.pyc
import encodings.utf_8 # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.7/encodings/utf_8.pyc
This particular example just shows the base set of imports that Python 2.7 on Fedora does at startup. When debugging a double-import RuntimeWarning
like the one in this question, you'd be searching for the "import proj" and then "import proj.proj" lines in the verbose output, and then looking closely at the imports immediately preceding the "import proj.proj" line.
Solution 2:
If you take a look at the double import trap you will see this:
This next trap exists in all current versions of Python, including 3.3, and can be summed up in the following general guideline: “Never add a package directory, or any directory inside a package, directly to the Python path”.
The reason this is problematic is that every module in that directory is now potentially accessible under two different names: as a top level module (since the directory is on sys.path) and as a submodule of the package (if the higher level directory containing the package itself is also on sys.path).
In tests/context.py
remove: sys.path.insert(0, os.path.abspath(os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), '..')))
which probably causes the problem and your code still works as expected.
Edit due to comment:
You can try and change some parts in your code:
-
proj/__init__.py
Can be completely empty -
On
test_proj.py
should change the imports as follows:import unittest from proj import proj
PS: I wasn't able to reproduce the warning on Linux with your initial code or with my suggestions either.
Solution 3:
@ncoghlan answer is right. I just want to add to his solution 1 that you only need to remove the import in __init__.py
if you execute your package with the -m
switch. That boils down to figuring out in __init__.py
whether python was called with the -m
switch. sys.flags
unfortunately does not contain an entry for the -m
switch, but sys.argv
seems to contain a single element containing "-m" (I did, however, not figure out whether this behaviour is doumented). So change __init__.py
in the following way:
import sys
if not '-m' in sys.argv:
from .proj import main
If you execute the package with the -m
switch .proj
will not be imported by __init__.py
and you avoid the double import. If you import the package from another script .proj
is imported as intended. Unfortunately, sys.argv
does not contain the argument to the -m
switch! So maybe moving the main() function to a separate file is the better solution. But I really like to have a main() function in my modules for quick and simple testing/demonstrations.
Solution 4:
If you are certain the warning is not relevant for you, an easy way to avoid it is ignoring RuntimeWarnings by the runpy
module that implements the logic behind the -m
switch:
import sys
import warnings
if not sys.warnoptions: # allow overriding with `-W` option
warnings.filterwarnings('ignore', category=RuntimeWarning, module='runpy')
This obviously may hide relevant warnings as well, but at least at the moment this is the only RuntimeWarning that runpy
uses. Alternatively filtering could be made more strict by specifying pattern for the message or line number where warning must occur, but both of these may be broken if runpy
is edited later.
Solution 5:
python -m is a bit tricky. @ncoghlan have already provided detailed information. when we try to run with python -m by default all packages within sys.path/pythonpath are imported. if your package have import statement to anything within the directories in the PATHs the above warning occurs.
My PYTHONPATH already have the Project directory. Thus when I do
from reader.reader import Reader
System throws the warning. Thus no need to have explicit imports if the path is in python path