Simplest way to read JSON from a URL in Java
Using the Maven artifact org.json:json
I got the following code, which I think is quite short. Not as short as possible, but still usable.
package so4308554;
import java.io.BufferedReader;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.io.InputStreamReader;
import java.io.Reader;
import java.net.URL;
import java.nio.charset.Charset;
import org.json.JSONException;
import org.json.JSONObject;
public class JsonReader {
private static String readAll(Reader rd) throws IOException {
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
int cp;
while ((cp = rd.read()) != -1) {
sb.append((char) cp);
}
return sb.toString();
}
public static JSONObject readJsonFromUrl(String url) throws IOException, JSONException {
InputStream is = new URL(url).openStream();
try {
BufferedReader rd = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(is, Charset.forName("UTF-8")));
String jsonText = readAll(rd);
JSONObject json = new JSONObject(jsonText);
return json;
} finally {
is.close();
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException, JSONException {
JSONObject json = readJsonFromUrl("https://graph.facebook.com/19292868552");
System.out.println(json.toString());
System.out.println(json.get("id"));
}
}
Here are couple of alternatives versions with Jackson (since there are more than one ways you might want data as):
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper(); // just need one
// Got a Java class that data maps to nicely? If so:
FacebookGraph graph = mapper.readValue(url, FaceBookGraph.class);
// Or: if no class (and don't need one), just map to Map.class:
Map<String,Object> map = mapper.readValue(url, Map.class);
And specifically the usual (IMO) case where you want to deal with Java objects, can be made one liner:
FacebookGraph graph = new ObjectMapper().readValue(url, FaceBookGraph.class);
Other libs like Gson also support one-line methods; why many examples show much longer sections is odd. And even worse is that many examples use obsolete org.json library; it may have been the first thing around, but there are half a dozen better alternatives so there is very little reason to use it.