Proof of recursive formula for "fusible numbers"
Solution 1:
That formula is wrong -- see here (linked to from here). That note also contains other interesting thoughts about the fusible numbers, including a new conjecture that would also imply that the order type of $F$ is $\epsilon_0$.
Here's some Java code I wrote to explore these numbers. You can place a red line somewhere by shift-clicking there, and then by clicking or dragging (without Shift) you can move a pair of green lines such that $a\oplus b = c$, where $a$ and $b$ are the numbers corresponding to the green lines and $c$ is the number corresponding to the red line. I used this to find for instance that 101/64 can be generated in three different ways: $101/64=3/4\oplus45/32=15/16\oplus39/32=31/32\oplus19/16$.
import java.awt.Color;
import java.awt.Dimension;
import java.awt.Graphics;
import java.awt.event.MouseAdapter;
import java.awt.event.MouseEvent;
import java.awt.event.MouseMotionAdapter;
import java.awt.event.MouseMotionListener;
import javax.swing.JFrame;
import javax.swing.JPanel;
public class FusibleNumbers {
static class BinaryNumber {
long mantissa;
int exponent;
public BinaryNumber (long mantissa,int exponent) {
this.mantissa = mantissa;
this.exponent = exponent;
normalize ();
}
public void normalize () {
if (mantissa == 0)
exponent = 0;
else
while ((mantissa & 1) == 0) {
mantissa >>= 1;
exponent--;
}
}
public double toDouble () {
return mantissa / (double) (1L << exponent);
}
public String toString () {
return mantissa + "/2^" + exponent;
}
}
static BinaryNumber getMargin (BinaryNumber x) {
if (x.mantissa < 0)
return new BinaryNumber (-x.mantissa,x.exponent);
BinaryNumber m = getMargin (new BinaryNumber (x.mantissa - (1L << x.exponent),x.exponent));
int newExponent = Math.max (x.exponent,m.exponent);
m = getMargin (new BinaryNumber ((x.mantissa << (newExponent - x.exponent)) - (m.mantissa << (newExponent - m.exponent)),newExponent));
m.exponent++;
m.normalize ();
if (m.exponent > 50)
throw new Error ("exponent overflow");
return m;
}
static int xmin;
static int xother;
public static void main (String [] args) {
JFrame frame = new JFrame ();
final JPanel panel = new JPanel () {
public void paintComponent (Graphics g) {
super.paintComponent (g);
int exponent = 9;
int scale = 1 << exponent;
Dimension size = getSize ();
for (int i = 0;i < size.width;i++) {
BinaryNumber b = new BinaryNumber (i,exponent);
BinaryNumber m = getMargin (b);
double d = b.toDouble () + m.toDouble ();
int x = (int) (d * scale + .5);
g.drawLine (x,0,x,size.height);
}
drawLine (g,size,xmin,Color.RED);
drawLine (g,size,xother,Color.GREEN);
drawLine (g,size,2*xmin - scale - xother,Color.GREEN);
}
private void drawLine (Graphics g,Dimension size,int x,Color color) {
g.setColor (color);
g.drawLine (x,0,x,size.height);
}
};
panel.addMouseListener (new MouseAdapter () {
boolean ctrl;
MouseMotionListener motionListener = new MouseMotionAdapter () {
public void mouseDragged (MouseEvent me) {
update (me);
}
};
public void mouseReleased (MouseEvent me) {
update (me);
panel.removeMouseMotionListener (motionListener);
}
public void mousePressed (MouseEvent me) {
ctrl = (me.getModifiers () & MouseEvent.SHIFT_MASK) != 0;
panel.addMouseMotionListener (motionListener);
update (me);
}
void update (MouseEvent me) {
if (ctrl)
xmin = me.getX ();
else
xother = me.getX ();
panel.repaint ();
}
});
frame.getContentPane ().add (panel);
frame.setBounds (0,0,1200,200);
frame.setVisible (true);
}
}
Solution 2:
I have expanded my note into a paper, available here. A Mathematica library of useful functions for exploring fusible numbers is available here, but I haven't written up a documentation for it. Hopefully you can figure out what the functions do. Have fun!
Just briefly mention a fact: $-\log_2\ m(3)$ is actually larger than $2\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow16$, following Knuth's up-arrow notation.
In fact the above should be a comment, but I don't have enough reputation here.
Solution 3:
It may be worth noting that a new paper on Fusible Numbers 'snuck onto' the arXiv earlier this year; it proves the order type $\epsilon_0$ and shows (unsurprisingly, given that) unprovability in PA of the statement 'there exists a next fusible number after $n$ for any $n\in\mathbb{N}$'. It doesn't entirely solve the minimal-gap question but establishes some new bounds, as well. The paper is "Fusible numbers and Peano Arithmetic" from Jeff Erickson, Gabriel Nivasch, and Junyan Xu, at https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.14342 .