Should I use virtual, override, or both keywords?
In the last weeks something is bugging my brain about virtual
and override
.
I've learned that when you do inheritance with virtual function you have to add virtual
to let the compiler know to search for the right function.
Afterwards I learned also that in c++ 11 there is a new keyword - override
. Now I'm a little confused; Do i need to use both virtual and override keywords in my program, or it's better to use only one of them?
To explain myself - code examples of what I mean:
class Base
{
public:
virtual void print() const = 0;
virtual void printthat() const = 0;
virtual void printit() const = 0;
};
class inhert : public Base
{
public:
// only virtual keyword for overriding.
virtual void print() const {}
// only override keyword for overriding.
void printthat() const override {}
// using both virtual and override keywords for overriding.
virtual void printit() const override {}
};
What is the best method?
When you override a function you don't technically need to write either virtual
or override
.
The original base class declaration needs the keyword virtual
to mark it as virtual.
In the derived class the function is virtual by way of having the ¹same type as the base class function.
However, an override
can help avoid bugs by producing a compilation error when the intended override isn't technically an override. For instance, the function type isn't exactly like the base class function. Or that a maintenance of the base class changes that function's type, e.g. adding a defaulted argument.
In the same way, a virtual
keyword in the derived class can make such a bug more subtle by ensuring that the function is still virtual in the further derived classes.
So the general advice is,
Use
virtual
for the base class function declaration.
This is technically necessary.Use
override
(only) for a derived class' override.
This helps maintenance.
Example:
struct Base { virtual void foo() {} };
struct Derived: Base { void foo() override {} };
Notes:
¹ C++ supports covariant raw pointer and raw reference results. With covariance the type of the override isn't exactly the same. It just has a compatible type.
According to the C++ Core Guidelines C.128, each function declaration should specify exactly one of virtual
, override
, or final
.
-
virtual
: For the "first" appearance of a function in the base class -
override
: For overrides of thatvirtual
function in a class derived from some base class providing avirtual
function of the same (or covariant) signature -
final
: For marking an override as unoverrideable. That is, derivatives of a class with afinal
virtual function override cannot have that virtual function override overridden.
struct A {
virtual void go() { puts("A"); }
};
struct B : A {
// Overrides A::go(). No need to specify `virtual` explicitly,
// it already implicitly is virtual and overrideable
void go() override { puts("B"); }
};
struct C : B {
void go() final { puts("C"); }
//virtual void go() override final { puts("C"); } would still compile,
// but it is considered, for lack of a better description, "extra"
};
struct D : C {
// Would produce error C3248 : 'C::go' : function declared as 'final' cannot be overridden by 'D::go'
//void go() override { puts("D"); }
};