Does a computer use fewer resources when programs are minimized?

Solution 1:

Yes. According to MS Support, the working set for a minimised application is trimmed. You can check this yourself with Process Explorer.

Here's a test of a single instance of Firefox 5.0 in Windows 7 x64 with a single tab of the ESPN.com website loaded. Values were read using Task Manager.

type                 not minimised  minimised     diff
------------------------------------------------------
working set               165,752k   163,768k  -1,984k
peak working set          169,624k   169,624k      N/A
mem (private working set) 121,600k   119,576k  -2,024k
commit size               135,576k   133,504k     -72k
paged pool                    396k       397k      +1k
np pool                        82k        81k      -1k
handles                        504        483      -21
threads                         34         31       -3
user objects                    40         44       +4
GDI objects                     71         75       +4

Here's a test of a single instance of Paint.NET in Windows 7 x64 with a few small images open. This app was written in Microsoft .NET unlike Firefox which is almost certainly C/C++.

type                 not minimised  minimised     diff
------------------------------------------------------
working set               125,904k   125,256k    -684k
peak working set          217,836k   217,836k      N/A
mem (private working set)  61,844k    61,844k       0k
commit size               102,388k   102,384k      -4k
paged pool                    542k       541k      -1k
np pool                        59k        59k       0k
handles                        741        741        0
threads                         19         19        0
user objects                   276        273       -3
GDI objects                    489        491       +2

Solution 2:

Yes and no. They will use less resources on your GPU - less need for screen refreshes - but not on your main system memory or CPU.

The working set size shown in the task manager is not the actual amount of memory consumed by an application. It is more of a ceiling of how much it could use at a given point in time.

If another app requests memory allocated to one process's working set that is not in active use this number can be driven down without changing the amount of memory the app is actually using.

Solution 3:

"Working Set" is NOT the same as "Memory Usage"

If a program needs a chunk of memory, it will always need it. If it doesn't, then it doesn't. Minimizing the program doesn't suddenly make the program 'not require' the memory. "Trimming" the working set is simply paging out the memory from physical memory onto the disk, or simply removing the page if it is available elsewhere on the disk. (In the latter case, the OS does it anyway if there is shortage of memory, so it's just a caching issue, not a 'usage' issue.) In either case, it does not reduce what the program uses; it merely relocates the data elsewhere.

That said, regarding CPU usage: there is something called a priority boost given by the OS in certain conditions, which can indeed cause a foreground application to use more CPU. See here for details.

Solution 4:

It really depends on the application that you're talking about and the way that the application is coded; however for comparison sake lets say that the program is coded in a way that it will run the same functions when maximized and minimized.

We would therefore expect the program to use the same amount of CPU when minimized if the same underlying functions are being called by the application.

However, your system processes will certainly use less CPU when the programs are minimized as there will be less graphics to be rendered for the application viewing, probably now just a system tray icon.

That is unless upon minimizing the application you cause a more graphical application to be brought into view and therefore rendered instead, now the CPU load could increase due to the extra graphics work load.

All in all the changes we are talking about here are probably going to be negligible unless your on a very low spec machine.