Can I use "has" after being a noun? [closed]
I have a question about verb agreement. Can I use "has" after [being + noun]?
For example, is has the correct form of the verb in the following sentence?
Being a celebrity has both some advantages and some disadvantages.
Solution 1:
Being a celebrity has both some advantages and some disadvantages.
The Subject of this sentence is the clause being a celebrity. Clauses functioning as Subject take singular verb agreement. It doesn't matter what type of clause it is. The Original Poster's example sentence happens to use a subject-less gerund-participle clause. This clause also happens to be a declarative clause. However, clauses of almost any description will take singular verb agreement:
- [What the elephants found] is not important.
- [Whether to go or not] is not the most important question.
- [That the students never finish their essays] really annoys me.
- [For Bob to say that] is extraordinarily hypocritical.
- [To err] is human.
- [Eating vegetables] is good for you.
So in the Original Poster's example the form of the verb has is completely grammatical.