Efficiently count word frequencies in python
I'd like to count frequencies of all words in a text file.
>>> countInFile('test.txt')
should return {'aaa':1, 'bbb': 2, 'ccc':1}
if the target text file is like:
# test.txt
aaa bbb ccc
bbb
I've implemented it with pure python following some posts. However, I've found out pure-python ways are insufficient due to huge file size (> 1GB).
I think borrowing sklearn's power is a candidate.
If you let CountVectorizer count frequencies for each line, I guess you will get word frequencies by summing up each column. But, it sounds a bit indirect way.
What is the most efficient and straightforward way to count words in a file with python?
Update
My (very slow) code is here:
from collections import Counter
def get_term_frequency_in_file(source_file_path):
wordcount = {}
with open(source_file_path) as f:
for line in f:
line = line.lower().translate(None, string.punctuation)
this_wordcount = Counter(line.split())
wordcount = add_merge_two_dict(wordcount, this_wordcount)
return wordcount
def add_merge_two_dict(x, y):
return { k: x.get(k, 0) + y.get(k, 0) for k in set(x) | set(y) }
The most succinct approach is to use the tools Python gives you.
from future_builtins import map # Only on Python 2
from collections import Counter
from itertools import chain
def countInFile(filename):
with open(filename) as f:
return Counter(chain.from_iterable(map(str.split, f)))
That's it. map(str.split, f)
is making a generator that returns list
s of words from each line. Wrapping in chain.from_iterable
converts that to a single generator that produces a word at a time. Counter
takes an input iterable and counts all unique values in it. At the end, you return
a dict
-like object (a Counter
) that stores all unique words and their counts, and during creation, you only store a line of data at a time and the total counts, not the whole file at once.
In theory, on Python 2.7 and 3.1, you might do slightly better looping over the chained results yourself and using a dict
or collections.defaultdict(int)
to count (because Counter
is implemented in Python, which can make it slower in some cases), but letting Counter
do the work is simpler and more self-documenting (I mean, the whole goal is counting, so use a Counter
). Beyond that, on CPython (the reference interpreter) 3.2 and higher Counter
has a C level accelerator for counting iterable inputs that will run faster than anything you could write in pure Python.
Update: You seem to want punctuation stripped and case-insensitivity, so here's a variant of my earlier code that does that:
from string import punctuation
def countInFile(filename):
with open(filename) as f:
linewords = (line.translate(None, punctuation).lower().split() for line in f)
return Counter(chain.from_iterable(linewords))
Your code runs much more slowly because it's creating and destroying many small Counter
and set
objects, rather than .update
-ing a single Counter
once per line (which, while slightly slower than what I gave in the updated code block, would be at least algorithmically similar in scaling factor).
A memory efficient and accurate way is to make use of
- CountVectorizer in
scikit
(for ngram extraction) - NLTK for
word_tokenize
-
numpy
matrix sum to collect the counts -
collections.Counter
for collecting the counts and vocabulary
An example:
import urllib.request
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
from nltk import word_tokenize
from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import CountVectorizer
# Our sample textfile.
url = 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Simdiva/DSL-Task/master/data/DSLCC-v2.0/test/test.txt'
response = urllib.request.urlopen(url)
data = response.read().decode('utf8')
# Note that `ngram_range=(1, 1)` means we want to extract Unigrams, i.e. tokens.
ngram_vectorizer = CountVectorizer(analyzer='word', tokenizer=word_tokenize, ngram_range=(1, 1), min_df=1)
# X matrix where the row represents sentences and column is our one-hot vector for each token in our vocabulary
X = ngram_vectorizer.fit_transform(data.split('\n'))
# Vocabulary
vocab = list(ngram_vectorizer.get_feature_names())
# Column-wise sum of the X matrix.
# It's some crazy numpy syntax that looks horribly unpythonic
# For details, see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3337301/numpy-matrix-to-array
# and http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13567345/how-to-calculate-the-sum-of-all-columns-of-a-2d-numpy-array-efficiently
counts = X.sum(axis=0).A1
freq_distribution = Counter(dict(zip(vocab, counts)))
print (freq_distribution.most_common(10))
[out]:
[(',', 32000),
('.', 17783),
('de', 11225),
('a', 7197),
('que', 5710),
('la', 4732),
('je', 4304),
('se', 4013),
('на', 3978),
('na', 3834)]
Essentially, you can also do this:
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
from nltk import word_tokenize
from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import CountVectorizer
def freq_dist(data):
"""
:param data: A string with sentences separated by '\n'
:type data: str
"""
ngram_vectorizer = CountVectorizer(analyzer='word', tokenizer=word_tokenize, ngram_range=(1, 1), min_df=1)
X = ngram_vectorizer.fit_transform(data.split('\n'))
vocab = list(ngram_vectorizer.get_feature_names())
counts = X.sum(axis=0).A1
return Counter(dict(zip(vocab, counts)))
Let's timeit
:
import time
start = time.time()
word_distribution = freq_dist(data)
print (time.time() - start)
[out]:
5.257147789001465
Note that CountVectorizer
can also take a file instead of a string and there's no need to read the whole file into memory. In code:
import io
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import CountVectorizer
infile = '/path/to/input.txt'
ngram_vectorizer = CountVectorizer(analyzer='word', ngram_range=(1, 1), min_df=1)
with io.open(infile, 'r', encoding='utf8') as fin:
X = ngram_vectorizer.fit_transform(fin)
vocab = ngram_vectorizer.get_feature_names()
counts = X.sum(axis=0).A1
freq_distribution = Counter(dict(zip(vocab, counts)))
print (freq_distribution.most_common(10))
Here's some benchmark. It'll look strange but the crudest code wins.
[code]:
from collections import Counter, defaultdict
import io, time
import numpy as np
from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import CountVectorizer
infile = '/path/to/file'
def extract_dictionary_sklearn(file_path):
with io.open(file_path, 'r', encoding='utf8') as fin:
ngram_vectorizer = CountVectorizer(analyzer='word')
X = ngram_vectorizer.fit_transform(fin)
vocab = ngram_vectorizer.get_feature_names()
counts = X.sum(axis=0).A1
return Counter(dict(zip(vocab, counts)))
def extract_dictionary_native(file_path):
dictionary = Counter()
with io.open(file_path, 'r', encoding='utf8') as fin:
for line in fin:
dictionary.update(line.split())
return dictionary
def extract_dictionary_paddle(file_path):
dictionary = defaultdict(int)
with io.open(file_path, 'r', encoding='utf8') as fin:
for line in fin:
for words in line.split():
dictionary[word] +=1
return dictionary
start = time.time()
extract_dictionary_sklearn(infile)
print time.time() - start
start = time.time()
extract_dictionary_native(infile)
print time.time() - start
start = time.time()
extract_dictionary_paddle(infile)
print time.time() - start
[out]:
38.306814909
24.8241138458
12.1182529926
Data size (154MB) used in the benchmark above:
$ wc -c /path/to/file
161680851
$ wc -l /path/to/file
2176141
Some things to note:
- With the
sklearn
version, there's an overhead of vectorizer creation + numpy manipulation and conversion into aCounter
object - Then native
Counter
update version, it seems likeCounter.update()
is an expensive operation