Best way to create singleton array
What is the "easiest" way for you to create a singleton (with exactly one element) Objects array in Java ?
Solution 1:
Object [] singleton = { new SomeObject() };
Solution 2:
The standard way is this:
String[] arr = new String[]{"I am the one and only"};
I'm afraid it doesn't get much simpler than this.
Edit: it does:
String[] arr = {"I am the one and only"};
Thanks aioobe, I keep forgetting this.
Of course if you often create array you can create a helper method that makes things a bit simpler:
public static <T> T[] asArray(T... items){
return items;
}
String[] arr = asArray("I am the one and only");
(But you can't enforce at compile time that it will be an array with only one element)
Next I was going to write a singleton array method, but Stephen beat me to that.
Solution 3:
If your project is already using Apache Commons lib, you can stick to ArrayUtils.toArray()
method.
String[] arr = ArrayUtils.toArray("The string");
// or if using static import
String[] arr = toArray("The string");
Even if using static import it is still more verbose than the accepted answer:
String[] arr = {"The string"};
But it comes very handy when compact array initializer syntax is not allowed.
Some examples:
someMethod(toArray("The string"), /* other params */);
return toArray("The string");
@DataProvider
public Object[][] someDataProvider() {
return rangeClosed(-12, +12)
.map(HOURS::toMillis).boxed()
.map(ArrayUtils::toArray)
.toArray(Object[][]::new);
}
You can imagine any other examples yourself.
Also note, that the ArrayUtils.toArray()
can wrap an arbitrary number of objects into array, not only a single one.
Solution 4:
enum solution(anti reflect attack):
enum MySingleton{
INSTANCE(new String[]{"a","b"});
final String[] values;
private MySingleton(String[] values) {
this.values = values;
}
}
reference it as:
MySingleton.INSTANCE;
Solution 5:
This should do the job
public SomeType[] makeSingletonArray(SomeType elem) {
return new SomeType[]{elem};
}
A generic version of this method would be somewhat awkward to use, since you would need to pass it a Class
object as an additional parameter.
Inlining the SomeType[]{elem}
expression is simpler, and that's how I'd normally do this.