Combine a list of Observables and wait until all completed

Solution 1:

You can use flatMap in case you have dynamic tasks composition. Something like this:

public Observable<Boolean> whenAll(List<Observable<Boolean>> tasks) {
    return Observable.from(tasks)
            //execute in parallel
            .flatMap(task -> task.observeOn(Schedulers.computation()))
            //wait, until all task are executed
            //be aware, all your observable should emit onComplete event
            //otherwise you will wait forever
            .toList()
            //could implement more intelligent logic. eg. check that everything is successful
            .map(results -> true);
}

Another good example of parallel execution

Note: I do not really know your requirements for error handling. For example, what to do if only one task fails. I think you should verify this scenario.

Solution 2:

It sounds like you're looking for the Zip operator.

There are a few different ways of using it, so let's look at an example. Say we have a few simple observables of different types:

Observable<Integer> obs1 = Observable.just(1);
Observable<String> obs2 = Observable.just("Blah");
Observable<Boolean> obs3 = Observable.just(true);

The simplest way to wait for them all is something like this:

Observable.zip(obs1, obs2, obs3, (Integer i, String s, Boolean b) -> i + " " + s + " " + b)
.subscribe(str -> System.out.println(str));

Note that in the zip function, the parameters have concrete types that correspond to the types of the observables being zipped.

Zipping a list of observables is also possible, either directly:

List<Observable<?>> obsList = Arrays.asList(obs1, obs2, obs3);

Observable.zip(obsList, (i) -> i[0] + " " + i[1] + " " + i[2])
.subscribe(str -> System.out.println(str));

...or by wrapping the list into an Observable<Observable<?>>:

Observable<Observable<?>> obsObs = Observable.from(obsList);

Observable.zip(obsObs, (i) -> i[0] + " " + i[1] + " " + i[2])
.subscribe(str -> System.out.println(str));

However, in both of these cases, the zip function can only accept a single Object[] parameter since the types of the observables in the list are not known in advance as well as their number. This means that that the zip function would have to check the number of parameters and cast them accordingly.

Regardless, all of the above examples will eventually print 1 Blah true

EDIT: When using Zip, make sure that the Observables being zipped all emit the same number of items. In the above examples all three observables emitted a single item. If we were to change them to something like this:

Observable<Integer> obs1 = Observable.from(new Integer[]{1,2,3}); //Emits three items
Observable<String> obs2 = Observable.from(new String[]{"Blah","Hello"}); //Emits two items
Observable<Boolean> obs3 = Observable.from(new Boolean[]{true,true}); //Emits two items

Then 1, Blah, True and 2, Hello, True would be the only items passed into the zip function(s). The item 3would never be zipped since the other observables have completed.

Solution 3:

Of the suggestions proposed, zip() actually combines observable results with each other, which may or may not be what is wanted, but was not asked in the question. In the question, all that was wanted was execution of each of the operations, either one-by-one or in parallel (which was not specified, but linked Bolts example was about parallel execution). Also, zip() will complete immediately when any of the observables complete, so it's in violation of the requirements.

For parallel execution of Observables, flatMap() presented in the other answer is fine, but merge() would be more straight-forward. Note that merge will exit on error of any of the Observables, if you rather postpone the exit until all observables have finished, you should be looking at mergeDelayError().

For one-by-one, I think Observable.concat() static method should be used. Its javadoc states like this:

concat(java.lang.Iterable> sequences) Flattens an Iterable of Observables into one Observable, one after the other, without interleaving them

which sounds like what you're after if you don't want parallel execution.

Also, if you're only interested in the completion of your task, not return values, you should probably look into Completable instead of Observable.

TLDR: for one-by-one execution of tasks and oncompletion event when they are completed, I think Completable.concat() is best suited. For parallel execution, Completable.merge() or Completable.mergeDelayError() sounds like the solution. The former one will stop immediately on any error on any completable, the latter one will execute them all even if one of them has an error, and only then reports the error.

Solution 4:

You probably looked at the zip operator that works with 2 Observables.

There is also the static method Observable.zip. It has one form which should be useful for you:

zip(java.lang.Iterable<? extends Observable<?>> ws, FuncN<? extends R> zipFunction)

You can check out the javadoc for more.