Pandas - replacing column values
I know there are a number of topics on this question, but none of the methods worked for me so I'm posting about my specific situation
I have a dataframe that looks like this:
data = pd.DataFrame([[1,0],[0,1],[1,0],[0,1]], columns=["sex", "split"])
data['sex'].replace(0, 'Female')
data['sex'].replace(1, 'Male')
data
What I want to do is replace all 0's in the sex column with 'Female', and all 1's with 'Male', but the values within the dataframe don't seem to change when I use the code above
Am I using replace() incorrectly? Or is there a better way to do conditional replacement of values?
Solution 1:
Yes, you are using it incorrectly, Series.replace()
is not inplace operation by default, it returns the replaced dataframe/series, you need to assign it back to your dataFrame/Series for its effect to occur. Or if you need to do it inplace, you need to specify the inplace
keyword argument as True
Example -
data['sex'].replace(0, 'Female',inplace=True)
data['sex'].replace(1, 'Male',inplace=True)
Also, you can combine the above into a single replace
function call by using list
for both to_replace
argument as well as value
argument , Example -
data['sex'].replace([0,1],['Female','Male'],inplace=True)
Example/Demo -
In [10]: data = pd.DataFrame([[1,0],[0,1],[1,0],[0,1]], columns=["sex", "split"])
In [11]: data['sex'].replace([0,1],['Female','Male'],inplace=True)
In [12]: data
Out[12]:
sex split
0 Male 0
1 Female 1
2 Male 0
3 Female 1
You can also use a dictionary, Example -
In [15]: data = pd.DataFrame([[1,0],[0,1],[1,0],[0,1]], columns=["sex", "split"])
In [16]: data['sex'].replace({0:'Female',1:'Male'},inplace=True)
In [17]: data
Out[17]:
sex split
0 Male 0
1 Female 1
2 Male 0
3 Female 1
Solution 2:
You can also try using apply
with get
method of dictionary
, seems to be little faster than replace
:
data['sex'] = data['sex'].apply({1:'Male', 0:'Female'}.get)
Testing with timeit
:
%%timeit
data['sex'].replace([0,1],['Female','Male'],inplace=True)
Result:
The slowest run took 5.83 times longer than the fastest. This could mean that an intermediate result is being cached.
1000 loops, best of 3: 510 µs per loop
Using apply
:
%%timeit
data['sex'] = data['sex'].apply({1:'Male', 0:'Female'}.get)
Result:
The slowest run took 5.92 times longer than the fastest. This could mean that an intermediate result is being cached.
1000 loops, best of 3: 331 µs per loop
Note: apply
with dictionary should be used if all the possible values of the columns in the dataframe are defined in the dictionary else, it will have empty for those not defined in dictionary.