Kerberos - Cannot find key of appropriate type to decrypt AP REP - RC4 with HMAC
I'm trying to setup SSO for Java WebApp using Kerberos/SpNego. I'm using:
- Java 1.7u67
- org.springframework.security.kerberos 1.0.0.RELEASE
- Active Directory
- Tomcat 7 on Linux
After overcoming the problem discribed in How to configure kerberos on Tomcat/linux server?, I'm now stuck with the following error:
org.springframework.security.authentication.BadCredentialsException: Kerberos validation not succesful
at org.springframework.security.kerberos.authentication.sun.SunJaasKerberosTicketValidator.validateTicket(SunJaasKerberosTicketValidator.java:70) ~[spring-security-kerberos-core-1.0.0.RELEASE.jar:1.0.0.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.security.kerberos.authentication.KerberosServiceAuthenticationProvider.authenticate(KerberosServiceAuthenticationProvider.java:64) ~[spring-security-kerberos-core-1.0.0.RELEASE.jar:1.0.0.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.security.authentication.ProviderManager.authenticate(ProviderManager.java:156) ~[spring-security-core-3.2.7.RELEASE.jar:3.2.7.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.security.kerberos.web.authentication.SpnegoAuthenticationProcessingFilter.doFilter(SpnegoAuthenticationProcessingFilter.java:145) ~[spring-security-kerberos-web-1.0.0.RELEASE.jar:1.0.0.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.security.web.FilterChainProxy$VirtualFilterChain.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:342) [spring-security-web-3.2.7.RELEASE.jar:3.2.7.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.security.web.authentication.AbstractAuthenticationProcessingFilter.doFilter(AbstractAuthenticationProcessingFilter.java:199) [spring-security-web-3.2.7.RELEASE.jar:3.2.7.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.security.web.FilterChainProxy$VirtualFilterChain.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:342) [spring-security-web-3.2.7.RELEASE.jar:3.2.7.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.security.web.authentication.logout.LogoutFilter.doFilter(LogoutFilter.java:110) [spring-security-web-3.2.7.RELEASE.jar:3.2.7.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.security.web.FilterChainProxy$VirtualFilterChain.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:342) [spring-security-web-3.2.7.RELEASE.jar:3.2.7.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.security.web.context.request.async.WebAsyncManagerIntegrationFilter.doFilterInternal(WebAsyncManagerIntegrationFilter.java:50) [spring-security-web-3.2.7.RELEASE.jar:3.2.7.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:107) [spring-web-4.1.6.RELEASE.jar:4.1.6.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.security.web.FilterChainProxy$VirtualFilterChain.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:342) [spring-security-web-3.2.7.RELEASE.jar:3.2.7.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.security.web.context.SecurityContextPersistenceFilter.doFilter(SecurityContextPersistenceFilter.java:87) [spring-security-web-3.2.7.RELEASE.jar:3.2.7.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.security.web.FilterChainProxy$VirtualFilterChain.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:342) [spring-security-web-3.2.7.RELEASE.jar:3.2.7.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.security.web.FilterChainProxy.doFilterInternal(FilterChainProxy.java:192) [spring-security-web-3.2.7.RELEASE.jar:3.2.7.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.security.web.FilterChainProxy.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:160) [spring-security-web-3.2.7.RELEASE.jar:3.2.7.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.web.filter.DelegatingFilterProxy.invokeDelegate(DelegatingFilterProxy.java:344) [spring-web-4.1.6.RELEASE.jar:4.1.6.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.web.filter.DelegatingFilterProxy.doFilter(DelegatingFilterProxy.java:261) [spring-web-4.1.6.RELEASE.jar:4.1.6.RELEASE]
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:241) [catalina.jar:7.0.55]
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:208) [catalina.jar:7.0.55]
at org.lightadmin.core.view.TilesContainerEnrichmentFilter.doFilterInternal(TilesContainerEnrichmentFilter.java:40) [lightadmin-1.2.0.RC1.jar:1.2.0.RC1]
at org.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:107) [spring-web-4.1.6.RELEASE.jar:4.1.6.RELEASE]
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:241) [catalina.jar:7.0.55]
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:208) [catalina.jar:7.0.55]
at org.springframework.web.filter.HiddenHttpMethodFilter.doFilterInternal(HiddenHttpMethodFilter.java:77) [spring-web-4.1.6.RELEASE.jar:4.1.6.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:107) [spring-web-4.1.6.RELEASE.jar:4.1.6.RELEASE]
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:241) [catalina.jar:7.0.55]
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:208) [catalina.jar:7.0.55]
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:220) [catalina.jar:7.0.55]
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:122) [catalina.jar:7.0.55]
at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:501) [catalina.jar:7.0.55]
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:171) [catalina.jar:7.0.55]
at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:103) [catalina.jar:7.0.55]
at org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:950) [catalina.jar:7.0.55]
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:116) [catalina.jar:7.0.55]
at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:408) [catalina.jar:7.0.55]
at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.process(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:1070) [tomcat-coyote.jar:7.0.55]
at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$AbstractConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:611) [tomcat-coyote.jar:7.0.55]
at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:316) [tomcat-coyote.jar:7.0.55]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) [na:1.7.0_67]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) [na:1.7.0_67]
at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread$WrappingRunnable.run(TaskThread.java:61) [tomcat-coyote.jar:7.0.55]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) [na:1.7.0_67]
Caused by: java.security.PrivilegedActionException: null
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) ~[na:1.7.0_67]
at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:415) ~[na:1.7.0_67]
at org.springframework.security.kerberos.authentication.sun.SunJaasKerberosTicketValidator.validateTicket(SunJaasKerberosTicketValidator.java:67) ~[spring-security-kerberos-core-1.0.0.RELEASE.jar:1.0.0.RELEASE]
... 42 common frames omitted
Caused by: org.ietf.jgss.GSSException: Failure unspecified at GSS-API level (Mechanism level: Invalid argument (400) - Cannot find key of appropriate type to decrypt AP REP - RC4 with HMAC)
at sun.security.jgss.krb5.Krb5Context.acceptSecContext(Krb5Context.java:788) ~[na:1.7.0_67]
at sun.security.jgss.GSSContextImpl.acceptSecContext(GSSContextImpl.java:342) ~[na:1.7.0_67]
at sun.security.jgss.GSSContextImpl.acceptSecContext(GSSContextImpl.java:285) ~[na:1.7.0_67]
at sun.security.jgss.spnego.SpNegoContext.GSS_acceptSecContext(SpNegoContext.java:875) ~[na:1.7.0_67]
at sun.security.jgss.spnego.SpNegoContext.acceptSecContext(SpNegoContext.java:548) ~[na:1.7.0_67]
at sun.security.jgss.GSSContextImpl.acceptSecContext(GSSContextImpl.java:342) ~[na:1.7.0_67]
at sun.security.jgss.GSSContextImpl.acceptSecContext(GSSContextImpl.java:285) ~[na:1.7.0_67]
at org.springframework.security.kerberos.authentication.sun.SunJaasKerberosTicketValidator$KerberosValidateAction.run(SunJaasKerberosTicketValidator.java:162) ~[spring-security-kerberos-core-1.0.0.RELEASE.jar:1.0.0.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.security.kerberos.authentication.sun.SunJaasKerberosTicketValidator$KerberosValidateAction.run(SunJaasKerberosTicketValidator.java:152) ~[spring-security-kerberos-core-1.0.0.RELEASE.jar:1.0.0.RELEASE]
... 45 common frames omitted
Caused by: sun.security.krb5.KrbException: Invalid argument (400) - Cannot find key of appropriate type to decrypt AP REP - RC4 with HMAC
at sun.security.krb5.KrbApReq.authenticate(KrbApReq.java:273) ~[na:1.7.0_67]
at sun.security.krb5.KrbApReq.<init>(KrbApReq.java:144) ~[na:1.7.0_67]
at sun.security.jgss.krb5.InitSecContextToken.<init>(InitSecContextToken.java:108) ~[na:1.7.0_67]
at sun.security.jgss.krb5.Krb5Context.acceptSecContext(Krb5Context.java:771) ~[na:1.7.0_67]
... 53 common frames omitted
However it seems that the key should be there, since on startup of the application I got the following debug:
Debug is true storeKey true useTicketCache false useKeyTab true doNotPrompt true ticketCache is null isInitiator false KeyTab is /opt/pksvc/tomcat_edl/current/conf/TestSpnego.keytab refreshKrb5Config is false principal is [email protected] tryFirstPass is false useFirstPass is false storePass is false clearPass is false
principal is [email protected]
Will use keytab
>>> KeyTabInputStream, readName(): MYREALM.DE
>>> KeyTabInputStream, readName(): HTTP
>>> KeyTabInputStream, readName(): lxdetstpksvc01.mydomain.de
>>> KeyTab: load() entry length: 83; type: 23
Ordering keys wrt default_tkt_enctypes list
Java config name: /opt/pksvc/tomcat_edl/current/conf/krb5.conf
Loaded from Java config
default etypes for default_tkt_enctypes: 23.
Commit Succeeded
So enctype 23 = RC4 with HMAC is the type of the KeyTab entry and the default enctype. I can also see that the browser sends a token with this enctype (I removed the binary part from the following):
Ticket TicketType{TktVno=5,Realm=MYREALM.DE,Sname=HTTP/lxdetstpksvc01.mydomain.de,EncPart=EncryptedData{Etype=23,Kvno=4,Cipher=binary[... 352 16728 KerberosV5.TicketType
Authenticator EncryptedData{Etype=23,Kvno=nothing,Cipher=binary[... 17080 2872 KerberosV5.EncryptedData
So everything seems to be encytpe 23 (RC4 with HMAC). When I had a look at the code I found that sun.security.krb5.EncryptionKey which is used by KrbApReq (which throws the error in the stack above) is indeed not only comparing the enctype, but also the version. So I guess that is what must be wrong in my case. In the ticket above is Kvno=4 for EncryptedData and for Authenticator EncryptedData it is Kvno=nothing. Should these match?
How can I resolve this? Is this influenced by the generation of the keytab?
It turned out the error above resulted from two problems:
The service principal in the spring configuration was wrong. It was [email protected], but HTTP/[email protected] is correct.
The Kvno in the keytab was not identical with the Kvno stored in the active directory. As stated on https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/windows-auth-howto.html Active Directory is raising the Kvno with every execution of ktpass. However I wasn't able to find the value (msDS-KeyVersionNumber) for it in our AD and could only grap it from the request.
Summarized the 'Cannot find key of appropriate type to decrypt ...' error can result from one of the following problems:
- The service prinicpal in the spring security configuration is not identical with that from the keytab (param /princ from ktpass).
- There is no key for the enctype the AD has send the ticket with (param /crypto from ktpass and set in the krb5.conf/permitted_enctypes+default_tkt_enctypes).
- The Kvno from the ticket is different then the Kvno in the keytab (param /kvno from ktpass).
- The path to the keytab is wrong (see answer from Xavier Portebois)
- The process does not have permissions to read the keytab (See comment from user7610)
We also got a Invalid argument (400) - Cannot find key of appropriate type to decrypt ...
error.
This can simply be thrown if the path to the keytab is wrong (in our case, we forgot we got a docker volume mapping there).
So, be sure the keytab path is the right one, as this could fire this weird exception.
This can also be thrown if your using Active Directory as the KDC and the keytab user is configured for a different encryption setting than your keytab is using. In my case AES 128 was configured and I was expecting AES 256. A simple change of the configuration within AD resolved the issue.