"And I you" with "you" as an indirect object

Solution 1:

According to The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (CGEL), the version without with is not grammatical.

Per chapter 15 "Coordination and supplementation", § 4.2 "Gapped coordination (Kim is an engineer and Pat a barrister)", p. 1338:

One limitation is that the antecedent cannot end with a preposition or infinitival to, so that the underlined items cannot be omitted in [9] even though they appear in the first clause too:

[9]   i  I went by car and Bill __ by bus.
                                   --
     ii  Kim was hoping to go to university and Pat __ to join the family business.
                                                       --

(where the "antecedent" is the part that the gap refers back to; "went" in the first example, "was hoping" in the second).