Why is pkexec preferred over gksudo for graphical applications?
Why it doesn't work?
By default pkexec
does not allow you to run graphical (X11) applications. From the man page:
The environment that PROGRAM will run it, will be set to a minimal
known and safe environment in order to avoid injecting code through
LD_LIBRARY_PATH or similar mechanisms. In addition the PKEXEC_UID
environment variable is set to the user id of the process invoking
pkexec.
As a result, pkexec will not allow you to run X11 applications
as another user since the $DISPLAY and $XAUTHORITY environment
variables are not set.
These two variables will be retained if the
org.freedesktop.policykit.exec.allow_gui annotation on an action is set
to a nonempty value; this is discouraged, though, and should only be
used for legacy programs.
As stated in the man page, you can make it work albeit I really don't know if this is somehow dangerous or recommended.
To enable gedit for example you can create /usr/share/polkit-1/actions/com.ubuntu.gedit.policy
with the following content:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE policyconfig PUBLIC
"-//freedesktop//DTD PolicyKit Policy Configuration 1.0//EN"
"http://www.freedesktop.org/standards/PolicyKit/1.0/policyconfig.dtd">
<policyconfig>
<vendor>gedit</vendor>
<vendor_url>gedit</vendor_url>
<icon_name>accessories-text-editor</icon_name>
<action id="org.freedesktop.policykit.pkexec.gedit">
<description>Run "gedit"</description>
<message>Authentication is required to run Text Editor</message>
<defaults>
<allow_any>auth_admin</allow_any>
<allow_inactive>auth_admin</allow_inactive>
<allow_active>auth_admin</allow_active>
</defaults>
<annotate key="org.freedesktop.policykit.exec.path">/usr/bin/gedit</annotate>
<annotate key="org.freedesktop.policykit.exec.allow_gui">true</annotate>
</action>
</policyconfig>
Then pkexec gedit
should work as expected:
As you can guess, this will only make gedit
work. In theory, if you added allow_gui
to "org.freedesktop.policykit.exec" (the default action) this should work for all applications, but in my tests I got the same result as yours.
Why is pkexec prefered?
Here you can find a discussion about the strengths of pkexec
.