What is the difference between "text" and new String("text")?
new String("text");
explicitly creates a new and referentially distinct instance of a String
object; String s = "text";
may reuse an instance from the string constant pool if one is available.
You very rarely would ever want to use the new String(anotherString)
constructor. From the API:
String(String original)
: Initializes a newly createdString
object so that it represents the same sequence of characters as the argument; in other words, the newly created string is a copy of the argument string. Unless an explicit copy of original is needed, use of this constructor is unnecessary since strings are immutable.
Related questions
- Java Strings: “String s = new String(”silly“);”
- Strings are objects in Java, so why don’t we use ‘new’ to create them?
What referential distinction means
Examine the following snippet:
String s1 = "foobar";
String s2 = "foobar";
System.out.println(s1 == s2); // true
s2 = new String("foobar");
System.out.println(s1 == s2); // false
System.out.println(s1.equals(s2)); // true
==
on two reference types is a reference identity comparison. Two objects that are equals
are not necessarily ==
. It is usually wrong to use ==
on reference types; most of the time equals
need to be used instead.
Nonetheless, if for whatever reason you need to create two equals
but not ==
string, you can use the new String(anotherString)
constructor. It needs to be said again, however, that this is very peculiar, and is rarely the intention.
References
- JLS 15.21.3 Reference Equality Operators == and !=
class Object
-boolean Object(equals)
Related issues
- Java String.equals versus ==
- How do I compare strings in Java?
String literals will go into String Constant Pool.
The below snapshot might help you to understand it visually to remember it for longer time.
Object creation line by line:
String str1 = new String("java5");
Using string literal "java5" in the constructor, a new string value is stored in string constant pool. Using new operator, a new string object is created in the heap with "java5" as value.
String str2 = "java5"
Reference "str2" is pointed to already stored value in string constant pool
String str3 = new String(str2);
A new string object is created in the heap with the same value as reference by "str2"
String str4 = "java5";
Reference "str4" is pointed to already stored value in string constant pool
Total objects : Heap - 2, Pool - 1
Further reading on Oracle community
One creates a String in the String Constant Pool
String s = "text";
the other one creates a string in the constant pool ("text"
) and another string in normal heap space (s
). Both strings will have the same value, that of "text".
String s = new String("text");
s
is then lost (eligible for GC) if later unused.
String literals on the other hand are reused. If you use "text"
in multiple places of your class it will in fact be one and only one String (i.e. multiple references to the same string in the pool).
JLS
The concept is called "interning" by the JLS.
Relevant passage from JLS 7 3.10.5:
Moreover, a string literal always refers to the same instance of class String. This is because string literals - or, more generally, strings that are the values of constant expressions (§15.28) - are "interned" so as to share unique instances, using the method String.intern.
Example 3.10.5-1. String Literals
The program consisting of the compilation unit (§7.3):
package testPackage; class Test { public static void main(String[] args) { String hello = "Hello", lo = "lo"; System.out.print((hello == "Hello") + " "); System.out.print((Other.hello == hello) + " "); System.out.print((other.Other.hello == hello) + " "); System.out.print((hello == ("Hel"+"lo")) + " "); System.out.print((hello == ("Hel"+lo)) + " "); System.out.println(hello == ("Hel"+lo).intern()); } } class Other { static String hello = "Hello"; }
and the compilation unit:
package other; public class Other { public static String hello = "Hello"; }
produces the output:
true true true true false true
JVMS
JVMS 7 5.1 says:
A string literal is a reference to an instance of class String, and is derived from a CONSTANT_String_info structure (§4.4.3) in the binary representation of a class or interface. The CONSTANT_String_info structure gives the sequence of Unicode code points constituting the string literal.
The Java programming language requires that identical string literals (that is, literals that contain the same sequence of code points) must refer to the same instance of class String (JLS §3.10.5). In addition, if the method String.intern is called on any string, the result is a reference to the same class instance that would be returned if that string appeared as a literal. Thus, the following expression must have the value true:
("a" + "b" + "c").intern() == "abc"
To derive a string literal, the Java Virtual Machine examines the sequence of code points given by the CONSTANT_String_info structure.
If the method String.intern has previously been called on an instance of class String containing a sequence of Unicode code points identical to that given by the CONSTANT_String_info structure, then the result of string literal derivation is a reference to that same instance of class String.
Otherwise, a new instance of class String is created containing the sequence of Unicode code points given by the CONSTANT_String_info structure; a reference to that class instance is the result of string literal derivation. Finally, the intern method of the new String instance is invoked.
Bytecode
It is also instructive to look at the bytecode implementation on OpenJDK 7.
If we decompile:
public class StringPool {
public static void main(String[] args) {
String a = "abc";
String b = "abc";
String c = new String("abc");
System.out.println(a);
System.out.println(b);
System.out.println(a == c);
}
}
we have on the constant pool:
#2 = String #32 // abc
[...]
#32 = Utf8 abc
and main
:
0: ldc #2 // String abc
2: astore_1
3: ldc #2 // String abc
5: astore_2
6: new #3 // class java/lang/String
9: dup
10: ldc #2 // String abc
12: invokespecial #4 // Method java/lang/String."<init>":(Ljava/lang/String;)V
15: astore_3
16: getstatic #5 // Field java/lang/System.out:Ljava/io/PrintStream;
19: aload_1
20: invokevirtual #6 // Method java/io/PrintStream.println:(Ljava/lang/String;)V
23: getstatic #5 // Field java/lang/System.out:Ljava/io/PrintStream;
26: aload_2
27: invokevirtual #6 // Method java/io/PrintStream.println:(Ljava/lang/String;)V
30: getstatic #5 // Field java/lang/System.out:Ljava/io/PrintStream;
33: aload_1
34: aload_3
35: if_acmpne 42
38: iconst_1
39: goto 43
42: iconst_0
43: invokevirtual #7 // Method java/io/PrintStream.println:(Z)V
Note how:
-
0
and3
: the sameldc #2
constant is loaded (the literals) -
12
: a new string instance is created (with#2
as argument) -
35
:a
andc
are compared as regular objects withif_acmpne
The representation of constant strings is quite magic on the bytecode:
- it has a dedicated CONSTANT_String_info structure, unlike regular objects (e.g.
new String
) - the struct points to a CONSTANT_Utf8_info Structure that contains the data. That is the only necessary data to represent the string.
and the JVMS quote above seems to say that whenever the Utf8 pointed to is the same, then identical instances are loaded by ldc
.
I have done similar tests for fields, and:
-
static final String s = "abc"
points to the constant table through the ConstantValue Attribute - non-final fields don't have that attribute, but can still be initialized with
ldc
Conclusion: there is direct bytecode support for the string pool, and the memory representation is efficient.
Bonus: compare that to the Integer pool, which does not have direct bytecode support (i.e. no CONSTANT_String_info
analogue).