Why can't I return an &str value generated from a String?

Solution 1:

First, let’s take a look at what lifetime is actually expected. There is an implicit lifetime in the signature of description:

fn description(&self) -> &str
// Can be rewritten as
fn description<'a>(&'a self) -> &'a str

The returned pointer must be valid for at least as long as self. Now consider s. It will hold a String, an owned string, and it goes out of scope at the end of the function. It would be invalid to return &s, because s is gone when the function returns. trim returns a string slice that borrows s, but the slice is again only valid for as long as s is.

You need to return a string slice that outlives the method call, so this rules out anything on the stack. If you were free to choose the return type, a solution would be to move the string out of the function. For that an owned string would be required, and then the return type would be String, not &str. Unfortunately, you are not free to choose the return type here.

To return a string slice that outlives the method call, I see two options:

1. Use a &'static string slice. This will certainly outlive the call, but it requires that the string be known at compile time. String literals have type &'static str. This is a suitable option if the description does not contain any dynamic data.

2. Store an owned string in LexicalError itself. This ensures that you can return a pointer to it that is valid for the entire lifetime of self. You can add a field desc: String to LexicalError and do the formatting when the error is constructed. Then the method would be implemented as

   fn description(&self) -> &str {
       &self.desc
   }
   

   For re-use, you can make Display write the same string.

According to the documentation of Error, Display may be used to provide additional detail. If you wish to include dynamic data in the error, then Display is a great place to format it, but you can omit it for description. This would allow the first approach to be used.