Resolving require paths with webpack

I'm still confused how to resolve module paths with webpack. Now I write:

myfile = require('../../mydir/myfile.js') 

but I'd like to write

myfile = require('mydir/myfile.js') 

I was thinking that resolve.alias may help since I see a similar example using { xyz: "/some/dir" } as alias then I can require("xyz/file.js").

But if I set my alias to { mydir: '/absolute/path/mydir' }, require('mydir/myfile.js') won't work.

I feel dumb because I've read the doc many times and I feel I'm missing something. What is the right way to avoid writing all the relative requires with ../../ etc?


Solution 1:

Webpack >2.0

See wtk's answer.

Webpack 1.0

A more straightforward way to do this would be to use resolve.root.

http://webpack.github.io/docs/configuration.html#resolve-root

resolve.root

The directory (absolute path) that contains your modules. May also be an array of directories. This setting should be used to add individual directories to the search path.

In your case:

webpack config

var path = require('path');

// ...

  resolve: {
    root: path.resolve('./mydir'),
    extensions: ['', '.js']
  }

consuming module

require('myfile')

or

require('myfile.js')

see also: http://webpack.github.io/docs/configuration.html#resolve-modulesdirectories

Solution 2:

For future reference, webpack 2 removed everything but modules as a way to resolve paths. This means root will not work.

https://gist.github.com/sokra/27b24881210b56bbaff7#resolving-options

The example configuration starts with:

{
  modules: [path.resolve(__dirname, "app"), "node_modules"]
  // (was split into `root`, `modulesDirectories` and `fallback` in the old options)

Solution 3:

resolve.alias should work exactly the way you described, so I'm providing this as an answer to help mitigate any confusion that may result from the suggestion in the original question that it does not work.

a resolve configuration like the one below will give you the desired results:

// used to resolve absolute path to project's root directory (where web pack.config.js should be located)
var path = require( 'path' );
...
{
  ...
  resolve: {
    // add alias for application code directory
    alias:{
      mydir: path.resolve( __dirname, 'path', 'to', 'mydir' )
    },
    extensions: [ '', '.js' ]
  }
}

require( 'mydir/myfile.js' ) will work as expected. If it does not, there must be some other issue.

If you have multiple modules that you want to add to the search path, resolve.root makes sense, but if you just want to be able to reference components within your application code without relative paths, alias seems to be the most straight-forward and explicit.

An important advantage of alias is that it gives you the opportunity to namespace your requires which can add clarity to your code; just like it is easy to see from other requires what module is being referenced, alias allows you to write descriptive requires that make it obvious you're requiring internal modules, e.g. require( 'my-project/component' ). resolve.root just plops you into the desired directory without giving you the opportunity to namespace it further.